User talk:Undertrialryryr

Welcome!

Hello, Undertrialryryr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Technopat (talk) 00:26, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm Technopat. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and it has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Technopat (talk) 15:09, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Thank you for your note. As I informed you above, your edits are not acceptable as they stand and I have reverted to previous versions of the articles. The "problem with the format" is yours, and it's up to you to sort it out, not merely revert and insist on leaving substandard versions of articles.

As for your question "how much time is spent on writing such articles and posting links", I can assure you that I do. And I shall answer it by asking you if you can imagine how much time is wasted by careless edits.

I shall now revert your edits one more time. If you insist on posting them again in their substandard format, without having made any attempt to conform to the style required by Wikipedia, as per the welcome I'll add to the top of this page, I shall start warning you for disruptive editing. But I'm sure that will not be necessary. If you have any further questions as to how you can improve your editing, you know how to contact me. Thank you. --Technopat (talk) 00:25, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Undertrialryryr, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Undertrialryryr! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ryan Vesey (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Auto driver Menace In India

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Auto driver Menace In India requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Uncletomwood (talk) 04:16, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Technopat (talk) 17:24, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

My account is older than Zordanlighter. Then how I am his sock . He should be my sock--Undertrialryryr (talk) 04:11, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you're requesting to be unblocked by an administrator, please use the unblock template by placing {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}} on your talk page. Otherwise administrator may not see this. Thank you. --Mysdaao ^talk 11:58, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Undertrialryryr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here Undertrialryryr (talk) 10:34, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See WP:LITTLEBROTHER on why that line of defence won't carry much weight. Huon (talk) 13:53, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Darkwind should understand that ZORDANLIGHTER is my relativeUndertrialryryr (talk) 13:07, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Undertrialryryr, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Silver Samurai 04:35, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]