User talk:Unavoidable

Question

What law school do you attend/did you graduate from?

XMithrandirx (talk) 04:15, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SCC Infobox

Just wanted to give a thank you for updating the SCC Infobox template and fixing the bugs. Looks a lot cleaner than it did before. (By the way, I made a bit of a change to the instructions for the input for court membership, as explained on the documentation talk page. Singularity42 (talk) 16:24, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Hubbard v Vosper

Hi, I'm Modern.Jewelry.Historian. Unavoidable, thanks for creating Hubbard v Vosper!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. WP:DGAF - as a disinterested party: repeatedly calling a judgement "leading" means it supports your view. Plaintiffs won an initial injunction, so they had some sort of valid argument, completely unrepresented here. Needs to be more neutral.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

That is not the context "leading" is used in. It is a "leading" case legally - it is one of the most important UK copyright cases on the doctrine of fair dealing. It has nothing to do with what point of view you are talking about. I have no vested interest in either party, therefore complying with DGAF. The case is important for being the first major UK case to synthesize past case law into a coherent "fair dealing defence". It is cited by many cases afterward. --Unavoidable (talk) 04:43, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Canadian trademark law, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Goodwill and Registrar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:17, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New 10,000 Challenge for Canada

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada/The 10,000 Challenge is up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge for the UK which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. If you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Canada like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1600 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for Canada but fuelled by a contest such as The North America Destubathon to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. I would like some support from Canadian wikipedians here to get the Challenge off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile! Cheers. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]