User talk:UnKnownrNone

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Wake Me Up (Avicii song), may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! DanCherek (talk) 02:54, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User page

See WP:UP for what can and cannot be on a User page. It is not a place for communicating with other editors - use your Talk page (or their Talk pages) for that. David notMD (talk) 13:05, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, UnKnownrNone. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - _uselesscontributions} 17:30, 18 June 2024 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

I see that you are new

Welcome to Wikipedia. I could see that you are new here by what you did and how you reacted so try to be patient.

When you are reverted, you should not revert back but discuss, per WP:BRD.
No, we don't link common terms, per WP:OVERLINK
You can be sure that any article which is posted as Today's featured article was checked by multiple editors.

I won't revert you but probably someone else will. Happy editing anyway. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 04:39, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Solstice

Wikilinking to Solstice - an astronomy term - does not benefit the article because the use of "solstice" in the game has no connection to astronomy. David notMD (talk) 18:16, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok UnKnownrNone (talk) 02:42, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:UnKnownrNone/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 10:05, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, UnKnownrNone! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 10:05, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Hi UnKnownrNone, I'm going to be blunt here: your edits are not so good. Some issues:

Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is not a social network. Around half of your edits are to your own userpage, and you have been sending a lot of wikilove messages to others. You have also created multiple user pages that are not yours, such as User:WikiPhil012 and User:2409:40D0:201B:D7E8:14D3:4510:56CE:1AF0. Please don't. User pages should only be created by the users themselves. While I'm sure you were acting good faith, please prioritize contributing to the encyclopedia rather than 'socializing' with others.
Most of your mainspace edits have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarize yourself with our policies and do some smaller beginner-friendly tasks, such as the ones listed at the task center.

Sorry if that discouraged you from editing in any way; I'm sure you're a great editor and just need some guidance. Feel free to contact me on my talk page if you have any questions. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 14:03, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the reason behind this is that I don't want to ruin Wikipedia and that's why whenever I have to do an edit I first do it on my user page and then on that specific article UnKnownrNone (talk) 02:15, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page isn't really meant for testing; use your sandbox or the public sandbox for that. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 02:34, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Thanks Sir..🙂 UnKnownrNone (talk) 02:43, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:UnKnownrNone/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 03:58, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Royal Public Senior Secondary School (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Royal Public Senior Secondary School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:57, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Royal Public Senior Secondary School (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CanonNi was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Do not resubmit without improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Royal Public Senior Secondary School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 10:39, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir Canoni,

Thank you for your feedback on my draft.

I appreciate your insights, and I will certainly make improvements in the next iteration.

Your guidance is invaluable, and I look forward to refining my work based on your suggestions.

Best regards, Tanish Kshatriya UnKnownrNone (talk) 10:46, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August music

Thank you for sending me a kitten! Today I have two "musicians" on the Main page, one is also the topic of my story, watch and listen, - I like today's especially because you see him at work, hear him talk about his work and the result of his work - rare! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:41, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

... and a third, like 22 July but with interview and the music to be played today --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:48, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

amazing 😸✌ ! UnKnownrNone (talk) 10:58, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! - On 13 August, Bach's cantata was 300 years old, and the image one. The cantata is an extraordinary piece, using the chorale's text and famous melody more than others in the cycle. It's nice to have not only a recent death, but also this "birthday" on the Main page. And a rainbow in my places. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:04, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

today's story is about a singer - regarding the "research" on the internet: it resulted in a pic taken by me, so can't show me, and the same birth date as of the person pictured would be un unlikely coincidence ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:45, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oh, that's nice! by the way I have also made many songs, do you want to listen my songs!?

🦁✌ UnKnownrNone (talk) 06:42, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

what's nice? - listen to Celestina Casapietra singing and speaking ;) - the speaking is in German but I think it is telling nontheless, for example that she liked to laugh --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:19, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was saying that your stories are always 'nice'! By the way, I know to speak and write in both Japanese & German!

Bist du wirklich 15 Jahre alt!? UnKnownrNone (talk) 12:26, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Gerda Arendt is 15 years old. I admire Japanese even more than German. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:56, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He/She is asking about your age and not the age of @Gerda Arendt by the way what's the main reasons for cancelation of draft on WikiPedia‽ Duolingoiscat (talk) 15:29, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think I understood the age question better. - I have nothing to with deletions in draft space, so can't answer the other. What I observe is that drafts that have been dormant for 6 months get deleted (after a warning to the principal editor), but have no idea if that's the main cause. All deleted drafts can be revived if you can convince an admin. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:37, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Duolingoiscat

When a draft or article is rejected on Wikipedia, it’s usually due to one or more of the following reasons:

Notability: The topic may not meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines. Articles should be about subjects that have received significant coverage in reliable sources. If the topic lacks sufficient independent references, it might be declined.
Verifiability: Information in the draft must be verifiable through reliable sources. If citations are missing or inadequate, the draft may be declined.
Neutrality: Wikipedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view. If the draft appears biased or promotional, it might be rejected.
Copyright violations: Content copied from other sources without proper attribution can lead to rejection.
Formatting and style: Poor formatting, lack of proper headings, or unclear writing can result in rejection.
Incomplete content: If the draft lacks essential sections (e.g., introduction, body, references), it may be declined.

Remember, revisions and improvements are encouraged! Feel free to address the feedback and resubmit your draft. 🌟

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

@Gerda Arendt Do you know how to speak and write in Japanese UnKnownrNone (talk) 06:07, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all, thus my admiration. I never managed to learn a language in a different character set, the Greek symbols in science were all I was able. - Thank you for a good explanation! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:13, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Song by UnKnowrNone

This was my first song UnKnownrNone (talk) 06:17, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phonk Composition (August 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GrabUp was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Phonk Composition and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GrabUp - Talk 07:13, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phonk Composition (August 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Phonk Composition and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:04, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phonk Composition (August 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CanonNi were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most parts of the draft are unsourced. Also seem to be AI-generated.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Phonk Composition and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 12:02, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vernier Constant (August 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ldm1954 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please look at other articles. Currently this is an essay, not an encyclopedic article. Also you must include sources to verify claims. Please rewrite.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vernier Constant and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ldm1954 (talk) 13:37, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

I've noticed that you have four "stars" linking to articles at the top of your userpage. Usually, linking to articles in this way implies those articles are a) WP:FAs and b) raised to that status by the user in question. Since only one of them is an FA and was nominated by a different user, many other editors may find these links confusing, if not deceptive. You also link to Proxima Centauri b with a start-class icon, which is confusing because a) that article is a GA and b) you did not start the article. I don't think you're being deliberately deceptive, but this could be confusing, so I'd advise you to change your userpage. See User:Sj's userpage for an example of how these icons are used. Thanks, Cremastra (talk) 15:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]