User talk:Umpire Empire

Your recent edits

I have seen that you are new here so I am giving you an advice:Read Wikipedia's rules carefully before editing.You have readded the Vlach claim at Spata family using a source that doesn't mention Spata family.

Also read Wikipedia's rules and then delete the Albanian identity of Progonos Sgouros.Use the talk page if there is no consensus about your recent edits.Rolandi+ (talk) 18:30, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If I were you pal, I'd follow your own advice about following the rules here ([1], [2]). Unlike you, I'm here to build an encyclopedia, which includes replacing pseudo-history with real facts per the very same Wikipedia policies you ignore when it suits you. Also, my edits aren't meant to step on anyone's toes, but what I did on some articles was justified if you bother reading specialist sources instead of misinterpreting them or peddling an Albanian ultranationalist agenda. I get that you're proud of your Albanian heritage, but you give Albanians a bad name every time you act like everything revolves around you. So, if you're really worried about not wanting to "scare" away new editors, then I respectfully ask you to stop playing games. Now if you'll excuse me, I've got work to do. Umpire Empire (talk) 17:09, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You said :"what I did on some articles was justified if you bother reading specialist sources instead of misinterpreting them".Your source at Spata family doesn't mention any Spata.You have to use reliable sources for your edits.Rolandi+ (talk) 17:42, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And you said "you have to use reliable sources for your edits", which is advice you yourself should follow since you wouldn't know a reliable source if it was plastered to your shoe. Like I said, you give Albanians a bad name (but I'll take a look at the Spata article and correct it if there's an error). Umpire Empire (talk) 19:03, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments are so ridiculous and useless as I'm not taking them seriously.If you don't find another source at Spata family undo your edits by yourself as it is the best choice for you.Rolandi+ (talk) 11:28, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of "ridiculous and useless comments", you should look in the mirror. Also, your passive-aggressive threats don't impress me and are one of the reasons why no one takes you seriously here (your track record says it all). As for the Spata family, I'm working on it (in the meantime, stop harassing me and do something useful for a change). Umpire Empire (talk) 14:19, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Go here:https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Umpire_Empire Rolandi+ (talk) 10:41, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Balkan sanctions

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Balkans/Macedonia, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Robert McClenon (talk) 12:47, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nicholas Thomaeus (Swedish Wikipedia)

At least I can't see anywhere a word that points to pseudo-history. I'm afraid I can help you only by mailing you a number of pdfs that offer more detailed info about the biography of the subject.Alexikoua (talk) 11:03, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No worries friend, but thanks for responding. Umpire Empire (talk) 13:38, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Zappas

Go here as there is a Dispute Resolution Noticeboard about Zappas case:[[3]].Rolandi+ (talk) 15:26, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DRN Notice

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! --JustBerry (talk) 15:26, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]