User talk:UltraWikipedian

February 2021

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

UltraWikipedian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i was fighting the vandal, im not him, unblock, im not him and i can prove, look at the investigations page, i reported his block evasion IPS thereUltraWikipedian (talk) 17:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 19:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

well atleast, we won, hes no longer able to edit for atleast a month, even with me blocked, im glad he wont come back for a looooong timeUltraWikipedian (talk) 17:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC) me? a jack vandal? what the hell? putting me as a jack sock is like putting bbb3 as a abuser, oh wait, the arbitration comitee already did that. UltraWikipedian (talk) 17:22, 6 February 2021 (UTC) you guys should already know that, if i make a account called, for example, DEEPFRIEDOKRA2 and vandalize, if you were not a admin, you would get blocked as a vandal, ive seen it happen multiple times, im here since 2018. UltraWikipedian (talk) 17:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)Apologies, but not convinced this is not Good hand/bad hand. ALSO, please address the personal attacks. As to the socking, hopefully the check user can illuminate us. We won?. Oh, FFS, Wikipedia is not a battlefield. We all lose when we need to address this behavior. ANy admin can unblock it they want to. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deepfriedokra, note that these accounts were created three minutes apart from each other. Steve M (talk) 17:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)~[reply]

i forgive you deepfriedokra, i know you may still suspect of good hand/bad hand, i already adressed the "personal attacks" and im sorry for it, ill never repeat it again, well, yes, hopefully a check user will prove me right, and yes, technically we "won", he got blocked, but we lost, i got blocked and the page now has this ugly edit warring shit there, i know wikipedia is not a battlefield and i tried my best not to completely loose my cool there, i know we all lose when needing to address this behavior, but, look at the good side, this 9 year old now got blocked. UltraWikipedian (talk) 18:04, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

note that its literally just because a kid got mad at me undoing his edits and decided to impersonate as me, well, he got rekt.UltraWikipedian (talk) 18:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, its because i get really angry at vandals, i promise i wont do it again, i know wikipedia is not a battlefield or else i would be dead, i know we lost but, as a smart guy said, we won but we lost but we won, but we lost. UltraWikipedian (talk) 17:28, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UltraWikipedian, why are both you and your impersonator created minutes apart from each other? Steve M (talk) 17:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

regarding the time, its just that he saw me undoing his edits and wanted me blocked, watch out for the IPS i reported, theyre probably going to get active when the range block expires, usually the range block expires in like, 1 hour, in 1 hour atleast 1 of them will be REALLY active, protect allied war crimes, hannes heer, wehrmarcht exhibition and the garden thing, be right back UltraWikipedian (talk) 17:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

its because this kid has fast hands, after i undo his vandalism using IPS, he made a account two mins after my first revert, and proceeded to impersonate as me, he was already trying to impersonate as me but it didnt work, also, USE CHECKUSER ON ME, IM IM BRAZIL AND HES IN USA, DOESNT THAT PROVE BASICALLY THAT IM INNOCENT? UltraWikipedian (talk) 17:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

as i see its ya boi josh suffered the same, he made a account and like a day later a kid made a account impersonating as him and vandalized, then ninja robot pirate refused. UltraWikipedian (talk) 17:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

if i make a account called, i dont know, CLCstudent 2 and vandalize, if he wasnt a famous editor, he would get banned because, according to you guys, if you were made minutes apart and name is similar, you are a vandal, FFS, none is going anywhere with this discussion, personal attacks? i just offended him because i got angry, and to be honest, he is, in fact, more dumb than a vacuum cleaner. UltraWikipedian (talk) 17:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The SPI's been left open - anyway, you're evading your block on ItsYaBoiJosh aren't you? And also, how do you know the location of the accounts? Pahunkat (talk) 17:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

im supposing that jack is american? he may be idk, KhmEr, also., no, i know its ya boi josh but im not himUltraWikipedian (talk) 18:06, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]