User talk:Ulrichlang

January 2007

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Middleware. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. — Isilanes 15:09, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Common Object Request Broker Architecture. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. — Isilanes 15:09, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Model-driven architecture. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. — Isilanes 15:09, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Firewall (networking). It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. — Isilanes 15:09, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Object request broker. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. — Isilanes 15:09, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2007

Hi Ulrich,

You ask me why I deleted your January 21st contributions. Please take a careful look at them.

You made a 20 minutes rampage of editions, in which you added links to the same web site to 5 different pages, plus a reference to a work authored by yourself. These editions are your only contribution ever to Wikipedia.

Did you consider that Wikipedia is not a place for self promotion? What is to stop anyone from thinking that you created an account with the sole purpose of inserting these links? While anyone is prone to think that the jobs of oneself are great, Wikipedia's policy prefers linking sources considered relevant by third persons. Please read the Wikipedia policy on how not to be a spammer, and rethink of how correct your editions and my reversions were.

Anyway, you are gladly welcome to make further corrections, additions and any improvement you see fit in the Wikipedia, and you could regard my reversions as incorrect as I regarded your editions. If you think an article misses relevant links, and some dimwit (as myself), reverts your additions, please comment the subject in the talk page of the given article, and ask people for their opinion. — Isilanes 12:37, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ObjectSecurity (December 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ObjectSecurity and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 02:39, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:ObjectSecurity concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:ObjectSecurity, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:ObjectSecurity

Hello, Ulrichlang. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "ObjectSecurity".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:ObjectSecurity}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:46, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:ObjectSecurity has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:ObjectSecurity. Thanks! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:40, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ObjectSecurity (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JMHamo was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ObjectSecurity and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JMHamo (talk) 15:18, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]