Jump to content

User talk:Ulamm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Soft redirect to:de:Benutzer_Diskussion:Ulamm
This page is a soft redirect.

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Horsebus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Greenwood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Berlin tram, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Accumulator (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback. I hadn't been aware of that problem, as in German "Akkumulator" is primarily the rechargeable electrochemical cell.--Ulamm (talk) 11:47, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Early diesel railcars

[edit]

Hi Ulamm, thanks for adding the early Saxon diesel railcars (de.wiki).

These are interesting. Those are a very early example of a diesel engine that was light enough for mobile use. At this time, most diesels were large, heavy single-cylinder designs. These are four cylinder and appear more like the high-speed diesel engines that became common from around 1930. At this time a petrol (gasoline) engine would have been much more likely (There were several petrol railcars in service worldwide by this time). Do you have any more details on them? Particularly their fuel type and their engine speed, maybe even the type of fuel injection pump, would be very interesting, as this indicates where on the history between slow-speed diesels and high-speed diesels they fitted in. Sulzer were an important maker for diesel development in these decades.

I've also taken the liberty of changing them from multiple units to railcars. I think this is probably a language issue but I don't see any indication that they were usable in multiples. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:55, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andy, I've just added some more vehicles.
My impression is, in early 19th century, the main problem with internal combustion motors was, how to use them for heavy vehicles.
Furthermore, in Europe petrol was expensive. With the initiative of Hungarian Lajos Láng for the construction of railmotors, Ganz Works' steam railcars (old fashioned solution) had lower costs per kilometer than the Weitzer railmotors.
The Saxon railmotors really ran on diesel. See the German WP-article linked. Imagine, just after the standstill of World War I, the first two diesel-electric loocmotives for the soviet Railways were built.
But I think, the most interesting European internal combustion rolling stock built between 1900 and World War I one were the petrol-electric Weitzer railmotors. Perhaps you have an idea how to mention them in survey articles?!.
Siemens-Schuckert company, that produced the electrical equipment, was also involved in the construction of Saxon DET 1 and 2.--Ulamm (talk) 14:37, 31 December 2012 (UTC)+Ulamm (talk) 15:03, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ACsEV

[edit]

Oh Ulamm, what have I gotten myself into? The fact is, I don't know too much about railway history, and a few quick searches were not very helpful, but I will do more work on grammar and such when I have time. To be quite honest, I have no clue how to answer your questions, but let me tell you whom you might contact for help.

  • The Arad County Library, through the text box at the bottom of the page. I've never dealt with them, and I know some libraries in Romania are less friendly than others, but it may be worth asking them.
  • Blogger romrail (romrail at clicknet dot ro). No idea who he is, but he's written about trains in Transylvania, so he might know something.
  • Marius George Oprea, author of this doctorate. His e-mail seems to be here - marius dot oprea at geografie dot ubbcluj dot ro.

I know this isn't too useful, but it may be a start. Happy New Year to you too, and keep up the good work. - Biruitorul Talk 23:00, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

ACsEV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Brad
Astra Automobile & Waggon Factory (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Westinghouse
Diesel locomotive (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Dongfeng
Weitzer railmotor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Metric gauge

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re-writing Steam engine

[edit]

I see you are watching this page, and added some info to a caption. I agree your edit was more informative and if the image had been in the steam engine#Steam locomotives section it would be more appropriate. What I am wrestling with here is to use 3 images- that span time- and geography to illustrate the 3 big uses. Effectively this section must be very general. I chose the Betzdorfer dampflok- because the angle showed the pistons and valve gear- it was the lastest I could reasonably find- and it was standing in a station near Bochum, the cradle of heavy industry. All this gives internal link potential when the article is refined.

steam engine#Steam locomotives need some expert attention. References are needing page numbers. Is any of the detail spurious and not on focus? Should anything be removed? There is nothing between the Rainhill trials and 1960. Can you write one tight paragraph to cover those 130 years- focusing on how the locomotive developed with the technology, and developed the technology. Anything too detailed can be put in Steam locomotive which is the linked main article.

I am just trying to rescue this article and keep it on focus an suscinct. Hope you have time to give a hand. --ClemRutter (talk) 22:17, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

O.k., in a general article about steam engines the explanation of the locomotive has to be shorter than in an article about railways. But the dating has to be correct. This special engine has been built in 1943, and Class 52 is called "the War Locomotive", in Germany.--Ulamm (talk) 22:37, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ancient tea route, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Markham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kühlung may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Lighthouse''. The northern slope of this ridge with its short valleys and deep natural pits ([[German language|Ger.:]] "Kuhlen" gave its name to the whole landscape. This slope is coverd by a
  • (natural landscape development plan) for central Mecklenburg and Rostock (UM M-V 2003) (PDF)]</ref>map of classified areas

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:22, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stege and Waidbach, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Beke and Bassin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shu Roads, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ming (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited North Sea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tyne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Schnoor may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • , which was meant as well geographically (ridge of the dune) as socially, or in the Langenstraße (Long street, along the ''Balge'', Bremen's first harbour, the Schnoor developped in 10th century as

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:59, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ports of Bremen, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Carlsburg and Geeste (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kingdom of Galicia–Volhynia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Legate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Baltic Sea, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Svir and Velikaya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Baltic Sea may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:04, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to Shu Roads

[edit]

Dear Ulamm, thank you for discussion on my style changes to Shu Roads. I agree the sentence starting with In time was still clumsy. See what you think of the change now. I think it is better and also there are still too many short paragraphs so merging this with the previous is better as well. I will be discussing the more serious (though still minor) changes later on my page. Cheers

Jdw518 (talk) 04:17, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited North Sea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tyne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to Shu Roads

[edit]

Dear Ulamm, I have put discussion of main changes I made (background to them) as well as a proposed replacement of a paragraph on the Shu Roads Talk area. I would appreciate your comments and discussion of the proposal.

cheers

Jdw518 (talk) 12:56, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of rivers discharging into the North Sea (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Spey, Hinterrhein, Begna and Ätran
Moray Firth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Strathcarron

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Undo Move from Aar Galciers to Aare Glaciers

[edit]

Please check my comments on Talk:Aare Glaciers#Undo Move from Aar Galciers to Aare Glaciers. Thanks -- ZH8000 (talk) 23:47, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lake Thun may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • (Water and Energy Department): Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Seeregulierung am Thuner See (Possibilities and limits of regulating the Thunersee]</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:41, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Shared lane marking may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * Thunder Bay (Ontario)]: [http://www.thunderbay.ca/Assets/Living/Active+Transportation/docs/Bike+Lanes+Shared+Lanes+

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:52, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bremen City Hall, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Neoclassic and Romanesque. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Basilica may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Cathedral (12643600644).jpg|thumb|left|[[Chester Cathedral]], a [[Perpendicular style]] basilica]]]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:40, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hall church

[edit]

Thanks for your edit of Hall church. I see that you have made nice cross-sectional drawings of various church designs, including the Aisleless church (Saalkirche). In Norway the most common type of church is the simple "long church", basically a single nave "Saalkirche" with a sloping or horizontal ceiling, often with plain wooden walls. Some are with a barrel-vault ceiling. Do you think it is fair to translate the Norwegian "long church" ("langkirke") to "aisleless church"? Can you please draw another cross section for this simplest type of design (plain sloping/horizontal ceiling and without pilasters)? Thanks. --Erik den yngre (talk) 16:47, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In Dutch, German, Polish and (not yet in WP but in other texts) in Czech, there is the term Zaalkerk/Saalkirche/… for churches without columns, literally that would be salkirke, I think, which does not imply that the interior is long and narrow, nor does exclude a long narrow shape (not in German, but perhaps in Norwegian (?) :). That term makes problems of translation to languages that do not distinguish hall and sal.
Another term is NL eenbeukige ~ or eenschepige kerk = DE einschiffige Kirche, but that term is rather used, if the undivided interior is vaulted.
I've drawn the hall church with and without vaults. So I do not object to draw a church without coloumns & without vaults, too.
But I shall draw only one more type (Of course, a church without columns may have a horizontal ceiling or an open roof, but I doubt if there is a use for a scheme of any single variation.)
Yours', Ulamm (talk) 19:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Now the missing scheme is there.--Ulamm (talk) 21:13, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent, thanks. This is very useful. Unlike continental Europe, most Norwegian churches are wood constructions, roofs (at least in the typical modest church) are usually rafter or timber roof truss constructions.
About the term "long church". In Norwegian this term is partly in a broad sense about churches with an elongated shape and the choir (chancel) in a separate, slightly smaller section in the eastern end, this includes basilica design and elongated octagonal designs. In a more narrow sense the term is used for the prototypical modest Norwegian church with a single rectangular nave, Sunnylven Church for instance. --Erik den yngre (talk) 11:08, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Further note: Seems like Dutch use "ship" (schiff)=nave like in Norwegian. In Norwegian we use "ship" (skip) for the main room of the church. In Norwegian, the term "central church" is used in contrast to "long church". A central church has a more symmetrical layout around a vertical focal point through the highest point of the roof, typical for some cruciform, round and octagonal churches.--Erik den yngre (talk) 18:14, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Borgund stavkyrkje, longitudinal, though the nave is not long
The term "central structure" (DE Zentralbau) is quite established, but I think, a church in the shape of a Latin cross normally is not called a central building.
In your own article nn:Sentralkyrkje, you are using that graphical comparison of four central structures and the Latin cross as their longitudinal couterpart.
See also in Store Norske Leksikon :)
There are quite a lot of variations:
Winchester Cathedral, with its 170.1 m is one of the longest curches of the world, if not the longest at all. Nevertheless it has a huge transept, and a crossing tower.
Some Westphalian hall churches are famous for their almost sqare ground-plan, but they are not called central structures, as they have no central tower nor trasept.
--Your's, Ulamm (talk) 21:23, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hall church, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Schneeberg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Historical innovative rolling stock

[edit]

Category:Historical innovative rolling stock, which you created, has been nominated for upmerging to Category:Rolling stock.. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:02, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shona-test

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:14, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Largoplazo. An edit that you recently made to Shona-test seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:14, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are o.k.
I only wanted to prepare the table outside the article. If I've saved it, it was erraneous.
Perhaps I'll even remove the table from the article. I've found more reliable informations.--Ulamm (talk) 22:10, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide further information

[edit]

Herr Dr Ulamm:

You uploaded a file some years ago, File:Oberschlesien 1921.png. It appears in the plebiscite map in such English articles as [1].

For that file, the type and amount of information provided is typical (usual), as compared to most other WIkimedia files.

However, as with most Wikipedia images, it is not truly sufficient to trace the content in a scholarly way, and therefore makes the material WP:OR if a source is not provided. That is, it is not possible from the file annotation, to tell unequivocally what source provided the information needed to present the graphic—in this case, which earlier atlas or other text that you used to generate this visual information.

For this reason, the content of the article where the image appears is not fully verifiable, per WP:Verify. Also, there is no way to answer simple technical questions—for instance, what the various shortened names (odd abbreviations) mean, that appear on the map.

My question to you:

Was this map re-drawn from Westermann's Monatshefte [Westermanns Monatshefte 1960 / 101. Jahrgang / Hefte 1 - 12 Verlag: Westermann, Braunschweig, 1960]? If not Westermann, from what source's information did you create it?

(Please, provide the source for your work. If you can provide a link, that would be most excellent.)

The following description appears in the accompanying description, without an English translation: "Die Markierung der Teilungsgrenze(n) erfolgte anhand Westermanns Monatshefte-Atlas (ca. 1960, "aktuelle" Karte in der damals üblichen retro-Darstellung). Die Darstellung von Kreisen, die nur teilweise zum Abstimmungegebiet gehörten, erfolgte anhand in Berichten genannter Ortsnamen."

Could you provide an English translation—your preferred translation—for the above text, and add it to the image file at Wikimedia commons? (I could translate it, but feel that you should be allowed to translate it, since it is your work, originally. If you would like me to check the English, I would be glad to do so.)

With kind regard, and thanks for your contributions, I am

Le Prof [User:Leprof_7272] 98.222.16.168 12:31, 6 July 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.222.16.168 (talk) [reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Trams in Basel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agglomeration. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bremen Cathedral, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French Empire. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Belarusian Gothic
added a link pointing to Slavic
Kodeń
added a link pointing to Gothic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Brick Gothic buildings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lilienthal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Testlist

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Testlist requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 13:52, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's o.k.. I really only wanted to test a wikitext before entering it into an existing larger article. I've saved it accidently.--Ulamm (talk) 14:25, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Brick Gothic buildings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brüggen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brick Gothic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ems. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

[edit]

I'm a bit surprised that an experienced editor is adding uncited text; the article is already (very) poorly cited, and very heavy on images, so it absolutely doesn't need more uncited text and more images. I'm sure you have a plan, but it would be best if citations were increasing and the other stuff decreasing, really.

I will happily have a go at smoothing the existing text if you think it needs copy-editing, but in truth that is not the first thing that needs work in this case. With my best wishes, Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One of the cite-web links led to a page that presented itself as "based on wikipedia" and therefore was no valid reference.
The other one is as useful without using the template.
I have to admit that I do not understand the function of the template, and I was too lazy to study the directions for its use.--Ulamm (talk) 12:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You were absolutely right to remove the Wikipedia clone reference.
There is no great problem giving references not formatted in the template, but it is hardly difficult. Here is a quick guide: <ref name="optional name to reuse the ref elsewhere in article">{{cite web|last1=Surname|first1=Forename|title=Put the title here|url=http://www.someplace.com|publisher=Publisher of website|accessdate=14 February 2016}}</ref>
My point was rather, that quality means text-with-refs; we can't rely on uncited material, even if there is a list of books at the end of the article (which book for which claim?). Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As you may have seen, meanwhile I have given a source for that part of my additions that can't be taken from dozens of current overall texts on Spain.
Filling in the form of the templet can make problems, quite often: Official websites of municipalities or provinces on their cultural heritage sometimes do not tell the name of the author of each of their contences.--Ulamm (talk) 12:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't matter, the author field is optional. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gewässerkennzahl
added links pointing to Danmark, Lune, Dollard and Ehle

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Gothic brick buildings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Viborg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wirdum, Friesland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tuf. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Gothic brick buildings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gubin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting

[edit]

Hi, thank you for your contribution to Visby#History. I have formatted the inter-wiki links and the language template for you, plus corrected the spelling. Please take a look at the corrections so that you know how to make these links the right way in the future. Best, cart-Talk 14:44, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Nevertheless, in lists I prefer <small>'''(IT)'''</small>, if I take care of the same list in more than one language. That way I only have to translate part of the names and – of course – the terms. I hate national codes (and unfortunately most templates are national specialties). Sometimes I really re-internationalize the code of a part of an article.--Ulamm (talk) 15:09, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The great thing about the {{ill}} or Template:Interlanguage link is that it shows the same as your example but it is automatically turned into a normal link as soon as the red-linked article is created on this Wikipedia and no one have to keep track of them and correct them. That is why it is recommended. cart-Talk 16:52, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That's great, indeed!--Ulamm (talk) 19:26, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Gothic brick buildings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Giles Daubeney. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 3 November

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Ulamm. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tides

[edit]

Hi Ulamm. I've reverted your edit because I found the diagram both confusing graphically and linguistically. It may be annoying, but most anglophones tend to be pretty poor at foreign languages and (partially as a result of English's global pre-eminence) expect English language works (such as en-wiki) to be in English. I'm afraid though I found the whole diagram confusing. By overlaying the the time-based tidal curve over a sketch of the bed it looks more like waves arriving at shore. To then put a wall of small black text over the top makes it hard still, particularly with the German/English issue.

I see that you are the author of the diagram, so may I make the following suggestions:

  1. Keep the seabed diagram just to the left hand quarter and use horizontal lines to project points of interest.
  2. Move the wall of explanatory text below the tidal curve.
  3. Avoid German terminology, particularly when it has no English language explanation (what is a stripy "Pegel" for instance?).

I'm sorry to be negative about your efforts but, as someone who has studied tides as an amateur sailor, I cannot see how in its present form it would help what WP:RF suggests: a high school pupil seeking information.

With kind regards, and apologies if this seems unfriendly, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 11:12, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I considered my edit something like emergency action. The text below mentioned the partly ununderstandable text in the graphic, trying to apologize it.
It's not an emergency, though it does need doing.
I produced this diagram in 2014 for German wikipedia. Due to nautic language, the German article shows both English and German terms.
I'd preferred to prepare an English version, withdrawing the German labelling and adding English explanations, where they are not already in the diagram. But this week I have other priorities. If I do not place the English labels differently from their actual positions, there will be an esthetical imbalance.
Don't worry, take your time.
Nevertheless my graphic, based on a forecast for a place in southern England, has some advantages:
I agree that this diagram is also misleading, I've been considering removing it as well. Just putting "average low water springs/average low water neaps" as a line below both "low water springs" and "low water neaps" doesn't make much sense. I suspect this is a translation issue from the Dutch.
Tide type only shows two days so it is a little unfair to criticise it for failing to show a monthly cycle.
I'd encourage you to wait until you have sufficient time and then do a good job. Please don't be offended, but I'd be happy to run a native speaker's eye over your work to look for any translation issues if you would like me to. Regards, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 12:48, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
English version
Meanwhile I've been chalanged. I did not change everything you have suggested, but monolingual it doesn't look as puzzling as the partly bilingual version. And some terms that were in German only I don't know in English.
But if you can accept this version and tell me the missing terms, I can add them.--Ulamm (talk) 14:37, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well done, that is a great improvement. I'm still a little concerned about overlaying time and distance, it does look like waves arriving on the shore, however the title goes a long way to clarify that. I'm also a little concerned that your "mean diurnal tide levels" are actually "mean semi-diurnal levels", to be honest I'd leave them out. If it is possible I'd switch the position of the black horizontal labels with that of the brown depths, at the moment the label "Neap tide" points directly at the HAT, which is unfortunate! Before I go on I have to state that your English is vastly better than my German; that said, please accept the following corrections:
  • nautic -> nautical
  • terrestric -> terrestrial, though land or land-based would be better in this context.
  • nautical maps are called charts or occasionally nautical charts.
  • MHWS is Mean High Water Springs, likewise MLWS.
Regards, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 15:38, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good work Ulamm, that is excellent. I hope you have a real feeling of satisfaction. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 23:25, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Weser, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Else and Schwalm. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Ulamm. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Gothic brick buildings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mondovi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Gothic brick buildings, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Revere and Sarnowo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Gothic brick buildings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Granowo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Gothic brick buildings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brudzew (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Gothic brick buildings, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gmina Olszanka and Kruszyna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[edit]

Please add your sources to Loppersum, Hinte. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 15:24, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please respond? What does 'weblinks' mean - sources used in the writing of the articles, or external links which may be helpful to look at, but haven't necessarily been used in the writing of the article? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 20:46, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I took the number of inhabitants from the page of the municipality. That is the second most reliable source after the state office of statistics.
Official websites are the most reliable sources available in our electronic age.--Ulamm (talk) 00:33, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for responding, I have moved that reference inline, so it is clear, please see article. What about the other 'weblink' - was that used as a source, and if so, for which piece of information? I'm guessing 'weblink' is the translation from the German, but its meaning on English WP is unclear, please see definitions of references and external links above. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 07:36, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • The othe link gives some more information on that village. But I do not intend to write a long article on it, other subjects have higher priorities for me, in Wikiedia and elswhere.
  • I should name that top "External links". "Weblinks" is a common heading in German Wikipedia, but in German view, "weblink" is an English word :) ______Ulamm (talk) 09:44, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Protestant church of Rinsumageast, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gothic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Gothic brick buildings, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Edam and Oudega (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of Gothic brick buildings (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Reimerswaal, Lek, Montfort, Serooskerke, Schalkwijk, Linschoten and Benschop

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Gothic brick buildings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mook (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Gothic brick buildings, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Balaton and Deurne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Gothic brick buildings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Satow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of Gothic brick buildings (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Goldberg, Karby, Pinnow and Stormarn

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback: Nils von Barth International comparison of bikelanes and shared lanes

[edit]
Hello, Ulamm. You have new messages at Nbarth's talk page.
Message added 21:08, 17 June 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Gothic brick buildings in Germany, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Borken and Brigden (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brick Gothic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Belfry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Belarusian Gothic

[edit]

Proposed deletion of Belarusian Gothic

[edit]
Notice

The article Belarusian Gothic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The subject definition is not sufficient, there is no definition what makes this particular type of gothic "Belarusian", no reliable sources which would clearly state and define "Belarussian gothic", illustrations are random selections of buildings from present day Poland and present day Belarus, e.g. Mir Castle Complex page states it is a Polish Gothic complex.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ke an (talk) 18:25, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Ulamm. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Uecker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gord (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:35, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Altamura Cathedral, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Castel del Monte (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:36, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rige-post framing

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Rige-post framing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

the editor made a spelling mistake in creating this and subsequently moved it to Ridge-post framing forgetting to delete this page.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bermicourt (talk) 16:16, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gotico Angioiano moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Gotico Angioiano, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 22:43, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gotico Angioiano has been accepted

[edit]
Gotico Angioiano, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

HenryTemplo (talk) 10:36, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited High Gothic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William of Holland.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

High Gothic
added a link pointing to Late Gothic
Worms Cathedral
added a link pointing to Late Gothic

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gothic Revival architecture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nancy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of Gothic Revival architecture

[edit]

You can add as many images as you like to this list. KJP1 (talk) 08:47, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is an approvabale project, but it will require some organizing, see the "small" facet Commons:Category:Gothic Revival brick churches in Regierungsbezirk Düsseldorf. I am just screening all churches of that administrative region, for hall churches and (repeatedly) for brick.--Ulamm (talk) 09:01, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of tautological place names, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Norse and Aabach.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ulamm&oldid=1258266276"