User talk:Uhhh..what?

Nomination of Bacon Cajun Ranch McCrispy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bacon Cajun Ranch McCrispy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bacon Cajun Ranch McCrispy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 18:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Uhhh..what?!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 19:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully on the page Sîn-lēqi-unninni, but because it appeared to be irrelevant to the article or violated the image use policy, it has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 05:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Shamhat, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 05:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Frederick Thomas Lynwood

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Frederick Thomas Lynwood, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 05:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Uhhh..what? (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, any admin that may see this. I like to say I am extremely repentant of my disruption to the greatest collaborative online encyclopedia in human history. I'm so sincerely sorry for uploading copyrighted images as I'm using a school computer and since they block everything on Go Guardian, I cant check to make sure the image is freely licensed or in public domain. I don't know how to really cite a article as when I do, it is blocked. So, if you could accept my sincere apology and give me a second chance I will undo my bads and be a good-faithed editor. Sincerely, Uhh...what? Uhhh..what? (talk) 16:37, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed to blocked user, 17yge. Yamla (talk) 16:54, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.