User talk:Uhdixbsidbivifjd

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Finealt (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Bonusballs (talk) 20:48, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Disney Junior. —C.Fred (talk) 20:25, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- GB fan 20:25, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Uhdixbsidbivifjd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry. No vandalism from me.

Decline reason:

Given the sockpuppetry and the fact that you continued after being warned with this account, I rather doubt you're sorry, or that you wouldn't continue if unblocked. Huon (talk) 01:28, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How do you explain this edit if it isn't vandalism? —C.Fred (talk) 20:39, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- GB fan 22:18, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]