User talk:Udta Punjab

Udta Punjab, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Udta Punjab! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Sikh Empire

Welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

In particular, always complete the Edit summary box on an article page before you save your edit. I hope you enjoy editing here. Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.

Your three edits to Sikh Empire have been reverted, as no part of present-day Afghanistan was in the Sikh Empire. Do not add them a fourth time without citing an accessible reliable source that supports your edit. Constant addition of the same unsupported edit constitutes edit warring and may lead to you being blocked from editing. Apuldram (talk) 17:50, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Hello, Udta Punjab, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Why do people not understand (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Sro23 (talk) 21:58, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is believed to be a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is permitted, but using them for illegitimate reasons is prohibited, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked (or were blocked in error), you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. We apologize for any inconvenience you have experienced. — Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 02:09, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Udta Punjab (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16653 was submitted on Oct 04, 2016 16:12:25. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 16:12, 4 October 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Udta Punjab (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16655 was submitted on Oct 04, 2016 18:04:08. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 18:04, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sikh conquest of the Punjab for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sikh conquest of the Punjab is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sikh conquest of the Punjab until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Garudam ^Talk! 00:07, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]