Jump to content

User talk:Udbhavsirvastav

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

hey its me udbhav feel free to contact me here

[edit]

hey its me udbhav feel free to contact me here edit down below this line

[edit]

Hello Udbhavsirvastav, as a paid contributor you have a conflict of interest and your new article Richa Jain should be vetted in the AfC process first (see WP:PE). Please do not move it again to the article space. It is not ready for article space and would either be moved back to draft space or nominated for speedy deletion.

Also please do not remove the AfC-declined templates from the draft. It's a normal thing to have these templates, and they are both helpful for other editors interested in enhancing the article, as well as other reviewers. – NJD-DE (talk) 20:57, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richa Jain (July 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 22:47, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Udbhavsirvastav! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 22:47, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ankitsharma96787 (talk) 01:19, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ankit Sharma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ankitsharma96787 (talk) 01:19, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richa Jain (July 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Locomotive207 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 03:35, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Himanshushukla433 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Himanshushukla433. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:23, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]