User talk:Ucraniano2

August 2023

Thank you for your enthusiasm, but I do not see how your edits today are an improvement. The svg images were clearly visually better. I will roll back all of your edits now. Please next time discuss before you start mass changes like this. Ymblanter (talk) 15:47, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An image has been added at your request--Ucraniano2 (talk) 16:23, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have seen this, thanks. Ymblanter (talk) 16:26, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit, there is a significant Romanian/Moldovan minority, so yes, such local names should not be removed. Mellk (talk) 17:17, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are there any sources that confirm that minorities have petitioned to change the name or transliterate it into Romanian? No. The official name is only Ukrainian. With your edits, you are trying to bring back the names that were at the beginning of the last century, which are now remembered by a small minority, only very old people--Ucraniano2 (talk) 17:30, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The guideline is WP:PLACE. Mellk (talk) 17:32, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no policy on Wikipedia that only official names are listed. Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans. This is a standard message to inform you that Eastern Europe or the Balkans is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:27, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may also want to see WP:RUSUKR. Ymblanter (talk) 18:28, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can this move be viewed as a violation? They also decided to remove the Romanian name again without explanation. Mellk (talk) 17:40, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:44, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 16:49, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hello, I'm CommissarDoggo. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2024 Crocus City Hall attack have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. CommissarDoggo^Talk? 22:58, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note, that, in addition to these edits being blatant vandalism, they are also not allowed per WP:RUSUKR. Ymblanter (talk) 23:12, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:2024 Crocus City Hall attack for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. CommissarDoggo^Talk? 23:12, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Shevchenkove, Izmail Raion, Odesa Oblast, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Mellk (talk) 17:38, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 08:24, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]