User talk:Ucla photonics laboratory

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Ucla photonics laboratory, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Calaka (talk) 09:08, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Serial time encoded amplified microscopy (STEAM)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Serial time encoded amplified microscopy (STEAM), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:20, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Serial time encoded amplified microscopy (STEAM)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Serial time encoded amplified microscopy (STEAM), a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion notice, which will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 09:51, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Serial time encoded amplified microscopy (STEAM). If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion notice, which will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 18:38, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Serial time encoded amplified microscopy (STEAM). If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 20:13, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Serial time encoded amplified microscopy (STEAM). If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 20:21, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Serial time encoded amplified microscopy (STEAM) do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.
Your edit here to Serial time encoded amplified microscopy (STEAM) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6nVy-fiNj8) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:44, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Serial time encoded amplified microscopy (STEAM)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Serial time encoded amplified microscopy (STEAM). If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 20:59, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

actually, the above noticeis inapplicable. As reviewing administrator, I declined the speedy, but neglected to remove the tag.

advice and warning

This article needs some improvements to remove the promotional tone, as follows: 1. Remove repetitions. The introductory matter should be a summary of what gets said in the article, not a repeat of it.
2. The name of the system should be used as little as possible. Refer to it as "the system", "the apparatus" , or the like.
3. Are there similar products, or is this the only one in its class? To what extent are the benefits generic?
4. All illustrations need a free copyright notice, as specified on their talk ps. I am not sure Fig. 1 is suitable in any case--it shows a drawing of the system, but without detail, and with elaborate and irrelevant flashy background. Remove it, but you are welcome to replace it with an actual photograph or drawing in a suitably plain technical style. When you do, remember the copyright license!
5. References need to be specific. Does ref 9 talk about MEMS generally, or does part of it talk about this system specifically. If it does, page references are needed; if not, remove it.

Most important, you need to shown notability by a. Third -party reviews in appropriate journals, independent of the developers. and, even more b. References to published scientific papers in peer-reviewed journals that make use of the system. If you wish to say it is suitable for particular uses, you need a reference of that sort for each of them. Wikipedia covers notable products, but in an informative, not a promotional style.

I advise you to fix the problem,s and do this very quickly, before the article gets nominated for deletion by a regular deletion process. The plainer the article, the more chance it will have. Additionally, you must choose another user name; we have a rule that only individuals can edit, and that the user name cannot indicate the name of an organization, in order to avoid the appearance that they control the page. On the new page, declare your affiliation and do the subsequent editing from it. And be careful about WP:Conflict of Interest see our page for that. ! I shall be back later today to see the progress, and make the necessary cuts myself if you do not. .

i notice you have made some further edits to this article, ignoring what I've said above. WP is not for promotion. I declined to delete the article, because I thought it fixable. If you insist on writing it in a promotional way, i will decide that it is , after all, not fixable. i'll check again Monday evening. If it remains similar to the present, I shall either delete it or rewrite it myself. DGG ( talk ) 17:24, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

and I see you've also added a section on it to the Microscopy article. There's no reason not to, but it should be just a brief summary and link to the main article, with duplicating the illustrations. I've fixed that.

What is needed most at the moment is references to support the applications. A method , even one published in Nature, is not notable unless it is used , or at least discussed, by others. Only key references need be given, but each use you mention needs a specific published article making significant use of it, or its speculation. We do not publish speculation.

And remember to use another user name. To make sure you do so, I have blocked it for violation of our username policy:only individuals can edit. Be sure to list your affiliation on the user page of the new account you choose. I'm trying to help this article stay in Wikipedia, which will be much more likely if my advice is followed. It's based on long experience here. DGG ( talk ) 00:10, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, Ucla photonics laboratory, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.