User talk:U2r2h

Notability of Michael Hezarkhani

A tag has been placed on Michael Hezarkhani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dihydrogen Monoxide (H₂O) 00:02, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Carmen Taylor

A tag has been placed on Carmen Taylor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dihydrogen Monoxide (H₂O) 00:07, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Carmen Taylor Michael Hezarkhani.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Carmen Taylor Michael Hezarkhani.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:09, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Nico Haupt

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Nico Haupt, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Nico Haupt seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Nico Haupt, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 21:30, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Pet theory

Pleae don't post your pet theories in Wikipedia articles, like you did on 9/11 conspiracy theories. We are an encyclopedia, not the place where everyone can post his own farfetched theories. Please check WP:V for our policy on sourcing. Fram (talk) 07:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Please don't denigrate my factual entries as theories. I know full well what wikipedia is about and do not need your non-specific, generalising, odious and patronizing dismissal. If the facts contradict your world-view then it is not my fault. The truth belongs into wikipedia, full stop. Many users profess untenable things in the talk-page, where discussions are encouraged. I am very restrained, but confronted with people like you -- who cannot accept facts if they contradict their pet theory on how the world works -- I have to defend logical thought. The heart of the matter is that you have an aversion against 9/11 conspiracy theories. If you think that the concept -- that 9/11 was entirely planned and coldly executed by the covert arm of the US and signed-off by the JCS -- is horrendous, you are right. But please refer to Operation Northwoods and Gladio and False Flag and get real. Do you think the burning of the Reichstag is a conspiracy theory? Now, if you do accept that 911 was an inside job, then you will have to explain how the airplane on the Hezarkhani footage can enter the side of the tower in a knife-through-butter kind of fashion (No Plane U2r2h Hologramme theory). You have to explain the contradictory flight-path as seen on TV on the day (TV fakery). There are numerous official documents that are so contradictory that wikipedia MUST ALLOW people to point that out. Instead, every FACTUAL reference that provides PROOF of shenanigans is methodically deleted on wikipedia. A case in point is the very image above. It shows an impossible event and as such is not permissable to those who cannot allow the 911-inside-job theory to stand. Had Wikipedia been around, Nazi Germany would never have happened, right? What do you think the 911-perpetrators will do next? Biological war? Will you then tell us that what Germans told us after the war "If only we had known" U2r2h (talk) 21:12, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

The Matrix

I saw this and ask you to please review the date of others' comments before you respond. Alientraveller's last comment in that discussion was in October 2008. He won't be responding to you anytime soon. Erik (talk) 19:06, 19 January 2010 (UTC)