User talk:Tzvi5742
Welcome!
Hello, Tzvi5742, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair | Talk 04:34, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
Welcome
[edit]Hello Tzvi5742 and welcome to Wikipedia. Feel free to call on me for any assistance. IZAK 09:47, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
- You've exhibited admirable moderation in your editing thus far, Tzvi. I'd not soil my reputation by calling on users like IZAK here (Wikipedia's king of false "anti-Semite" or "self-hater" accusations) for assistance. Shem(talk) 11:18, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
- I just noticed Shem's uncalled for comments here. I am not "king" of anything, I have never called anyone a "self-hater" and I do not run around accusing people of being anything they are not, as I have better things to do with my time on Wikipedia. Seems nowadays Shem is obsessed with "kahanists" (which I am most definitely not) and imagines that anyone speaking up for Jews and Judaism or Israel and Zionism is not good in his eyes. At any rate, my "claim to fame" as they say lies in my extensive work with Category:Jews and Judaism and Category:Israel and Zionism on Wikipedia, and I have no time for Shem's pathetic uncalled for personal attack here. Best wishes and do as you see fit. IZAK 09:55, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
- "Anyone speaking up for Jews and Judaism or Israel and Zionism is not good in his eyes." See Tzvi, it only took him two days. Again, best not to head for IZAK's wing when seeking neutral assistance. Shem(talk) 02:34, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
- This seems like a personal quarrel between the two of you and I'd rather not get involved. However, I do have to question how asking someone for assistance, whether or not they are considered neutral or non-pov by their fellow wikipedians, ruins my reputation? There's a saying that one who learns from all men is wise. I'm glad to have both of you here to learn from. The world isn't pure black and white, there are many shades of gray; that's probably where the truth is. Tzvi 23:01, August 16, 2005 (UTC)
- "Anyone speaking up for Jews and Judaism or Israel and Zionism is not good in his eyes." See Tzvi, it only took him two days. Again, best not to head for IZAK's wing when seeking neutral assistance. Shem(talk) 02:34, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
- I just noticed Shem's uncalled for comments here. I am not "king" of anything, I have never called anyone a "self-hater" and I do not run around accusing people of being anything they are not, as I have better things to do with my time on Wikipedia. Seems nowadays Shem is obsessed with "kahanists" (which I am most definitely not) and imagines that anyone speaking up for Jews and Judaism or Israel and Zionism is not good in his eyes. At any rate, my "claim to fame" as they say lies in my extensive work with Category:Jews and Judaism and Category:Israel and Zionism on Wikipedia, and I have no time for Shem's pathetic uncalled for personal attack here. Best wishes and do as you see fit. IZAK 09:55, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
Rejection of Tanakh
[edit]Hi Tzvi: Please see and vote at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 December 12#Category:Hebrew Bible at [1] where it is beeing suggested that the word "Tanakh" is "not neutral", and I am trying to explain to them that it is in keeping with NPOV to convey the way Judaism uses certain terms to describe the Hebrew Bible/Tanakh. Thanks. IZAK 16:20, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Abraham Mosque.JPG
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Abraham Mosque.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZsinjTalk 20:00, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Image:HPIM4902.JPG listed for deletion
[edit]--Sherool (talk) 22:50, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)