User talk:Typekept

August 2011

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/User:Shrik88music. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 18:40, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Shrik88music (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —SpacemanSpiff 15:13, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Typekept (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

nBlock doe not serve any fruitful purpose. Questions raised by me in discussion page needs answers. Why no efforts to improve the article is not being made? Difference is - http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=J._Jayalalithaa&action=historysubmit&diff=447700445&oldid=447699513 and discussion page contains the questions which have never been answered. Contribution needs to be respected and user should not be blocked for such trivial reasons. Neither there is an edit war not there is a disruptive editing. Not any sock puppet. Dont run away without answering the questions. your reason here Typekept (talk) 1:11 pm, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. TN X Man 17:20, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Typekept (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Block is unnecesaary as no offence has been committed by me. There is no reason from anyone as to why i have been blocked. What i contributed to Jayalalithaa article was reverted and so i have jotted down the points where the present article needs changes - in discussion page. See discussion page of Jayalaithaa article.I have made useful contribution but it has been ignored and i have been victimised. Just see http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=J._Jayalalithaa&oldid=447699513 and you can see i have removed all the queries raised earlier and also the mistakes - which are present in current version.Typekept (talk) 04:30, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Why you are blocked is indicated at the top of the page and in the notice you see every time you edit this page, but I'll repeat it for you a third time. You are blocked because both behavioral and technical evidence indicates that you are a sockpuppet account. Further unblock requests that ignore the actual reason for the block will lead to revocation of your ability to appeal in this mannerBeeblebrox (talk) 04:39, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.