User talk:Tyler Gonzalez

June 2015

Hello, I'm Amaury. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Evanescence, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Amaury (talk) 04:55, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I had to revert you last edit on Lana. The first edit changed Calldwell to Alldwell, which the first is what the title is, and the second is that Lana hasn't had a match yet. She hasn't wrestled, so she's not a wrestler yet. --w^L^{<speak·check>} 04:43, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lana (wrestling). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. w^L^{<speak·check>} 05:18, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lana (wrestling), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. w^L^{<speak·check>} 05:34, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Tyler Gonzalez reverting maintenance tags..The discussion is about the topic Lana (wrestling). Thank you. w^L^{<speak·check>} 05:53, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Lana (wrestling). Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Callmemirela {Talk} ♑ 06:20, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Lana (wrestling) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Callmemirela {Talk} ♑ 06:23, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 06:49, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Tyler_Gonzalez reported by User:Callmemirela (Result: ). Thank you. Callmemirela {Talk} ♑ 06:34, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Lana (wrestling). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 16:38, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. w^L^{<speak·check>} 09:05, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lana (wrestling), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. w^L^{<speak·check>} 07:17, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Your recent editing history at Lana (wrestling) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.LM2000 (talk) 22:20, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.LM2000 (talk) 23:37, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The complaint about your edits has been closed with seven days of full protection of Lana (wrestling). If you keep reverting on this article when protection expires you are risking a long block. You have never posted anything to a talk page, yours or anyone else's, which suggests you have no interest in discussion. EdJohnston (talk) 05:45, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. LM2000 (talk) 22:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:23, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have received multiple warnings about your battlefield approach to Lana (wrestling), have been blocked twice for edit warring on it, and have been reported to WP:EW for it resulting in the article being protected - yet you have continued regardless. This latest block is for a month, and you should expect blocks to escalate further if you resume your edit war again when this one expires. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:29, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Lana (wrestling) a few hours ago, You have received multiple warnings about your battlefield approach to Lana (wrestling), You have been I see blocked twice for edit warring on it, she is a trained wrestler period. If you keep up this disruptive editing I will have no choice but to report you to an Admin. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" (talk) 10:15, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]