Jump to content

User talk:TylerMagee

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
TylerMagee My talk Testing

New discussion

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, TylerMagee, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 10:50, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fancade (2) (October 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 10:50, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, TylerMagee! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 10:50, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Information icon Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Mekorama. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:09, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay! TylerMagee (talk) 08:35, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Test Wikipedia (October 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 17:19, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help request

[edit]

TylerMagee (talk) 16:17, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can see several areas where your edits have been reverted, but what, specifically, are you asking for help with? — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 22:32, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

[edit]

Please leave page moves to more experienced editors, as you've had several moves reverted now. If you're interested in learning a little more about article naming, you can read at Wikipedia:Article titles. -- ferret (talk) 22:35, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I will try my best! However, I can edit pages to undo vandalism. TylerMagee (talk) 09:43, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft Sandbox

[edit]

Stop deleting stuff from Draft Sandbox. That is a place for anyone to practice editing skills. It is automatically wiped clean frequently. Nothing there counts as vandalism. David notMD (talk) 11:32, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, the 'welcome to the sandbox' template keeps getting replaced by something that causes vandalism. Why are you stopping me from protecting the sandbox? TylerMagee (talk) 11:35, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's a waste of time and doesn't need protected. As David already told you, there is an automated bot that handles cleaning it up. -- ferret (talk) 14:57, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fancade (October 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 18:45, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bogus allegations of vandalism

[edit]

Please refrain from disrupting Wikipedia with bogus allegations of vandalism, as you did in this edit [1] where you reverted as "vandalism" my edit to my own userpage at User:BrownHairedGirl/Articles with new bare URL refs (deliberately not linked).

That page is in my userspace, and until your hostile intervention it had only ever been edited by me. It is hard to think of any situation where an editor's edit to their own userpage might be legitimately considered to be WP:Vandalism ... and in this case your revert was itself possibly an act of vandalism, because it disrupted a page used to control a bot.

I have no idea what could have led you to that page, because it has no incoming links. So your revert looks like some sort of wilful disruption. If there is some other explanation, I hope you will provide it. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:49, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I only made an accident... TylerMagee (talk) 13:13, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I was attempting to restore your commit, I am really sorry. Don't block or ban me... TylerMagee (talk) 13:15, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
attempting to restore your commit -- That much is obvious. But why?
Why did you think that it was appropriate to do so? Why were you even on that page? And why did you label my edit as "vandalism"? -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:36, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

More disruption by you

[edit]

I have just removed[2] two templated warnings[3][4] which you posted at User talk:Adityareddygurjapur after that editor had already been warned and blocked. The warnings posted by you were at best superfluous, and could be seen as goading of a blocked editor.

Please refrain from any further attempts at patrolling edits by others until you have a lot more experience of Wikipedia and have demonstrated a much greater understanding of how it works. If you continue as you have started, you may find yourself being blocked. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:12, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Protection requests

[edit]

Please do not make baseless requests to protect pages indefinitely for "vandalism", especially when neither page is seeing any vandalism at this time. -- ferret (talk) 14:31, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please also do not pointlessly request indefinite pending changes because a "page may see vandalism", when the page is already semiprotected. Pending changes does not do anything to stop autoconfirmed edits. -- ferret (talk) 14:35, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, sorry! TylerMagee (talk) 14:36, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop moving pages

[edit]

You do not appear to understand naming guidelines and are moving pages needlessly, which can be very disruptive. You are very close to seeing a block if you do not heed past advice. -- ferret (talk) 14:37, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in History of British film certificates, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. MOS:CAPS MoonlightVectorTalk page 14:39, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Protection needed

[edit]

Template:Protection needed has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. John of Reading (talk) 07:27, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]

I have blocked you for two weeks for disruptive edits and for incompetence. When your block expires, your only option is to stay away from anything except making constructive edits to articles. Do not move pages. Do not post at administrative noticeboards (your recent requests at WP:RFPP were nonsensical). Do not engage in counter-vandalism. See WP:GAB for your appeal rights.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:53, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I already did go submit an unblock twice yesterday. tyler magee • talk 08:08, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TylerMagee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not create distruptive edits anymore! tyler magee • talk 18:53, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've repeatedly said here that you'll stop. You demonstrated you don't plan to. Why should we believe your word and not your actions? Yamla (talk) 20:04, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock, again??

[edit]

{Unblock|reason=I will not do distruptive edits, and I will stop it. I will only edit constructively and fight vandalism from now. tyler magee • talk 12:11, 14 November 2021 (UTC)} tyler magee • talk 12:11, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't answer the question I posed to you earlier. Given that you've repeatedly said you will stop and then demonstrated you have no intention of doing so, why should we believe you this time? --Yamla (talk) 12:13, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I did not demonstrate that I would do the opposite. I will edit constructively from now on. tyler magee • talk 12:15, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You seem to be arguing your block should be extended indefinitely. Is that really, really what you want? Stop and think here. --Yamla (talk) 12:18, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No. tyler magee • talk 12:19, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Great. So, given that your edits were clearly disruptive, given that you have repeatedly said you'd stop making disruptive edits and then continued, what if anything has changed now? --Yamla (talk) 12:21, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I will no longer edit unconstructively - I will edit constructively and fight vandalism from now. tyler magee • talk 12:24, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Again, you've said that before. What's changed? Last chance. --Yamla (talk) 12:26, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I understand the policies now. tyler magee • talk 12:27, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have extended your block indefinitely. You are free to contest your block, but you need to display massively more competence and a much deeper understanding than you have been able to demonstrate so far. --Yamla (talk) 12:28, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
: I do not like I infinite blocks. I am sorry and do promise to listen to the Wikipedia guidelines in the future, as well as the policies. And I know I was blocked for distruptive editing, which I will stop doing. tyler magee • talk 12:44, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I will never go to this project again, until you say that I am unblocked. Bye. tyler magee • talk 12:51, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose See their behaviour on meta. SHB2000 (talk) 07:15, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Android 90

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Android 90, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Nutshinou Talk! 08:38, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 51277

[edit]

UTRS appeal #51277 is closed. Activity on META noted. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Help:Simplified tutorial

[edit]

Help:Simplified tutorial, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Help:Simplified tutorial and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Help:Simplified tutorial during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:58, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Odd Bot Out

[edit]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Odd Bot Out, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Waxworker (talk) 15:01, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Odd Bot Out

[edit]

Information icon Hello, TylerMagee. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Odd Bot Out, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Odd Bot Out

[edit]

Hello, TylerMagee. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Odd Bot Out".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 14:28, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TylerMagee&oldid=1117215571"