User talk:Twirk88

Welcome!

Image copyright problem with Image:WilsonEuph.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:WilsonEuph.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:17, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

eliot kleinberg

No, I was just cleaning up a little. KnightLago 14:08, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Euphoniumrange.JPG

Hi - I see you recently created the useful playing range image for the euphonium article. I have two comments regarding this, but am unable to perform the edits myself as I do not have Finale:

The image is a JPG, and would be better as a PNG (like most other instrument range images) to avoid the JPG compression artefacts
The top of the range is in tenor clef. The text in the article currently refers to the top of the range as "... below the bass clef ... to ... above [the bass clef]...", so no mention of tenor clef. Would it be better to illustrate the top of the range also in bass clef? Mcpgv 22:31, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BellRehearsal.jpg

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:BellRehearsal.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Android Mouse Bot 2 17:56, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

--Android Mouse Bot 2 17:56, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Herwigob.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Herwigob.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:51, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article move from "Thad Jones/Mel Lewis Big Band" to "Vanguard Jazz Orchestra"

Hi. I placed the following note in the Vanguard Jazz Orchestra discussion page.
I was surprised to see this page moved to a different title. I would recommend the article be returned to its original title. According to the "What links here" listing, there are currently around 20 wiki articles that reference the "Thad Jones / Mel Lewis Big Band" directly and only a few (~3) that seem to reference the "Vanguard Jazz Orchestra" uniquely (i.e. only a few that reference the orchestra as it exists post Jones/Lewis). This seems to support the assumption that the "Thad Jones/Mel Lewis Big Band" (and/or "...Orchestra") is the more useful and relevant article title. These ~20 references are specifically to the band as it existed during the period with Thad Jones and Mel Lewis as co-leaders and not to the later VJO incarnation. I think the previous arrangement made more sense ("Vanguard Jazz Orchestra" redirects to "Thad Jones/Mel Lewis Big Band"). One could always start a new article for the Vanguard Jazz Orchestra if desired. Pugetbill 14:19, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BellRehearsal2.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:BellRehearsal2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 15:59, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LucienBarbarin.png

Thanks for uploading Image:LucienBarbarin.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:22, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:CIMG0215.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CIMG0215.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:16, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edits you made to My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy have been reverted, as they appear to be unconstructive. If you believe the edits were constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. -- Dan56 (talk) 20:56, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 23:45, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Did you check out the links in my last post here? That's the funny thing with encyclopedias. Unlike forums, you need a reliable source to verify it. Crazy, isn't it. Dan56 (talk) 03:05, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The source is the New Yorker article that comprises two pages. The statement is supported by the second page. Dan56 (talk) 03:18, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Bard stonerow 2007.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:49, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Euphoniumrange.JPG

The file File:Euphoniumrange.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]