User talk:Twejoel

Welcome!

Hello Twejoel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Nlu 09:07, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

La Grande Armée

Regarding your edits to the article La Grande Armée. Please do not remove large, well-developed sections of an article without first discussing the proposed changes on the article's talk page, and achieving a general consensus. Repeatedly changing or removing content without consensus may be seen as vandalism. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! Cheers. --PeruvianLlama^(spit) 02:33, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

La Grande Armée

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Owen× ☎ 02:33, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I was going to say basically what Llama and Owen have, but they beat me to it. But I can add, please stop playing with this article. I've put a lot of time and effort into it. If you want to make a major change, then let's discuss it first...that's what talkpages are for.Thanks--R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 09:10, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

La Grande Armée

Oops, sorry (to Llama, Owen and R.H.D) if i had caused much inconveniences. Just to clarify, i was not playing with the article. In fact i found the article great and thought i could chipped in... Nevertheless, im still interested in chipping in and hoped you guys wont mind however i will discuss the changes with you guys first. Do reply. =) Thanks-Twejoel 09:56, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No problem dude! You are welcome to contribute! Hope you are not too discouraged, but I moved your Order of battle (I think for the 1805 campaign?) to the article's talk page HERE. So it is neither gone nor forgotten. I just moved it for now. Later, when I start the history section, that should come in very useful, thank you. By the way, I also like the reference you added to Col. Luvaa's book. I have have high regard for him as a historian and Napoleonic scholar. Cheers:>--R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 10:55, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for letting me contribute and making my work feel worthy, i appreciate it very much. However i guess i should not interupt your project and decided to create a new article. I have already started on it but not yet complete. Its also on the Napoleonic Wars except im focussing on the Allied Forces. Do feel free to contribute if you feel like it because the information i found around are not very detailed. The page is quite hard to find on the search bar though. This link would bring you direct to it

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Allied_Forces_of_the_Napoleonic_Wars Yea, Cheers to you too. =) -Twejoel 01:45, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Brltcav.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Brltcav.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. --OrphanBot 06:57, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Flag_140uk.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Flag_140uk.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 05:27, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Hvydragoons.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hvydragoons.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 19:48, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Wellingtona.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wellingtona.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 08:05, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Images

Regarding my edits to the article La Grande Armée, I've removed all of the images in this article as I could not signify the copyright information. Therefore to "play safe" I decided that it would be better removed. Cheers! Twejoel 17:56, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sending template messages to other users

Hi, Twejoel. When sending npa template messages to other users, could you consider subst'ing them by using {{subst:npa}} instead of {{npa}}? That reduces the load on the server. It also ensures that if the actual template is vandalized, the message on the user's talk page won't be affected. The same goes for many of the template messages, for example, {{subst:test1}} etc. If in doubt as to whether a particular template is suitable for subst'ing, you could try viewing it in "preview" before pressing "save". Thanks. AnnH ♫ 13:52, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Pixiu.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pixiu.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:34, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Counter_Vandalism_Unit_Logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Counter_Vandalism_Unit_Logo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:36, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Counter Vandalism Unit Logo2.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Counter Vandalism Unit Logo2.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 00:42, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can

The article Allied Forces of the Napoleonic Wars, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring cleanup.

If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Wikipedia's quality standards. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the article's talk page.
If you do not want to receive bot-generated messages on your talk page, please consider using the nobots template on your user talk page

Images listed for deletion

Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion if you are interested in preserving them.

Thank you. Bigr Tex 03:21, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Colonization cover.jpg

Hello, Twejoel. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Colonization cover.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Twejoel. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 22:37, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 16:53, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Twejoel! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:43, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Twejoel,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]