User talk:Tweetsabird


Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #68

Mickey Madden(Singer) and Jesse Carmichael(Singer)

Tags have been placed on Mickey Madden(Singer) and Jesse Carmichael(Singer), requesting that they be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because they are very short articles providing ~~little or~~ no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. Additionally, neither Madden nor Carmichael are singers. They are a bassist and a keyboardist, respectfully. Lastly, the correct formatting for titles puts a space between the last letter of the name and the opening parenthesis.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you want to dispute this request, affix the template {{hangon}} to the nominated page(s) and state your intention on the article talk page(s). Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.. Regards, LaraLove^Talk/_Contribs 06:02, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jenn Thomas

A tag has been placed on Jenn Thomas, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Адам12901 ^T/_C 00:58, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2007

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Jenn Campbell, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Slp1 01:20, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to George W. Bush. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Mbc³⁶² 03:41, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to George W. Bush. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Leuko 03:53, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to The Rolling Stones. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--John 20:24, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you introduced a flag icon to the article on The Rolling Stones. I had recently removed it after raising the matter at the relevant discussion page (Talk:The Rolling Stones#Flag). Would you mind discussing there before adding this again? Thanks. --John 20:27, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of notices

Please do not delete notices unless you have responded to these requests. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 20:29, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject The Rolling Stones

I started a WP for the Stones. Please join and spread the word. Stan weller 06:40, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Agnello's

I don't understand why you deleted the Jewish category from their pages. Maybe you are in denial or something, but the fact is that they are part Jewish. Live with it.--Goodfellajohnny 07:51, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where do I begin? First off it's "you're", not "your". Also, it's "their mother", not "there mother". Right, so who's the idiot again? You just did the math yourself. You did the math wrong though. That would mean the kids are roughly 15%. Whether you like it or not they have Jewish blood. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goodfellajohnny (talk • contribs) 04:30, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Please make sure that you include a descriptive edit summary with any edit, even one that you deem to be minor, to assist other editors and admins in checking diffs. It is particularly helpful when pages are still in development by their primary contributor. [1] Esradekan 13:57, 26 September 2007 (UTC).[reply]

November 2007

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to White American, you will be blocked from editing. JScott06 23:27, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. — madman bum and angel 21:55, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Karis Jagger

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Karis Jagger, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Karis Jagger. ... discospinster _talk 01:11, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Karis Jagger

I have nominated Karis Jagger, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karis Jagger. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ... discospinster _talk 22:51, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Burning Up Tour

Hi, the recent edit you made to Burning Up Tour was helpful to building more articles for Wikipedia, but please use the sandbox for testing. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. calliegal_x (talk) 00:14, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Calliegal[reply]

Vandalism

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Don't Forget, you will be blocked from editing.

October 2008

Please do not attack other editors, as you did with this edit to: User talk:Nikiangelz. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Edgehead 5150 02:44, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of J.O.N.A.S episodes

I have nominated List of J.O.N.A.S episodes, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of J.O.N.A.S episodes. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. roux 01:49, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gossip bio as reference

That site you added as a reference is using an early version of the wiki article as its source of information. --NrDg 16:05, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Camilla Belle

People is a gossip magazine, not a reliable source. I have looked for reliable sources on her relationship status in vain. You were right to remove Brazilian citizenship - that was unsourced, and I couldn't find any sources that said it. Fences and windows (talk) 05:01, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

USA

Hi, I notice that in some infoboxes you've been changing from "U.S." to USA. You may not be aware of this, but we do not link to commonly known words, such as major geographical locations, and the United States is certainly a well-enough known country that it does not require linking. It's all explained in WP:OVERLINK. Thanks Rossrs (talk) 07:26, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary for your edits. Thank you. NrDg 15:57, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Jonas

I see that you do not use edit summaries at all. Please consider leaving one when you remove sourced content as you have at least twice now on the Nick Jonas article. Your actions could be considered disrubtive and could lead to a block. A new name 2008 (talk) 11:16, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nick Jonas. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. See my reply to your messages on my talk page as well. NrDg 22:11, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Selena Gomez

You should probably take a look here to see why I keep removing United States from her birthplace. By reverting my edits, you are going against Wikipedia manual of style, and I advise you stop before you get blocked for unproductive edit warring. Pokerdance ^{(talk/contribs)} 16:14, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in Selena Gomez, makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Also, please do not assume ownership of articles. POKERdance ^talk/contribs 00:26, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User talk:Pokerdance. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. POKERdance ^talk/contribs 03:18, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User talk:Pokerdance. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Stop copying warnings that I have issued you legitimately, and posting them on my talk page for no reason. POKERdance ^talk/contribs 16:38, 7 August 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Tweetsabird. You have new messages at Pokerdance's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you abuse a warning or blocking template, as you did to User talk:Pokerdance, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. POKERdance ^talk/contribs 02:24, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Tweetsabird. You have new messages at Pokerdance's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You've also been reported to WP:AIV for persistent vandalism. POKERdance ^talk/contribs 02:38, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Tweetsabird. You have new messages at Pokerdance's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

POKERdance ^talk/contribs 02:45, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you abuse a warning or blocking template, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tan | 39 03:03, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Mifter (talk) 03:27, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Songs that reached number one on CCM chart

I have nominated Category:Songs that reached number one on CCM chart (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 02:29, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Hi Tweetsabird!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 18:36, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tweetsabird. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]