User talk:TweetiePie1947

TweetiePie1947, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi TweetiePie1947! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ryan Vesey (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies filmography (1950–59) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* Last Pairing of Daffy Duck and Elmer Fudd untill 1990 ( in terms of Production And Release order

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:01, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Person to Bunny may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*This cartoon was officially cancelled out of theaters when it was debuted in 1960 ( The cartoon was supposed to be released in 1959. That was partilly unavoidable due to a long lead

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:52, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Person to Bunny may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

writing that cartoon wheb it was released, he left the studio and Went over To [[Hanna Barbera]] ( However he was credited in [[The Mouse Of 57th Street the last cartoon he veen working on ]] .

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:51, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm Trivialist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Warner Bros. Cartoons, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 20:43, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Person to Bunny, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies filmography (1950–59), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Person to Bunny

Please stop adding "cancelled out of theatres" or similar language to Person to Bunny, unless you can provide a source and better explain what you mean. Thanks. Trivialist (talk) 15:34, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please provide a source and explain what you mean. Thanks. Trivialist (talk) 22:01, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Person to Bunny, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Collingwood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Person to Bunny

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Person to Bunny, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 11:54, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, do you have any evidence for your additions to Person to Bunny, or are you just guessing? Unless you have proof that it was "cancelled out of theatres" (which seems unlikely), do not add it to the article. (Also, are you Speedygonzalesoscarrulzz on Looney Tunes Wikia?) Trivialist (talk) 18:44, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can you at least stop blindly reverting? Your reverts keep changing the link to Charles Collingwood (journalist) to Charles Collingwood, a disambiguation page. Trivialist (talk) 22:49, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source that says its release was cancelled, or are you just assuming it was cancelled? Trivialist (talk) 02:21, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Person to Bunny, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Collingwood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Person to Bunny, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 15:21, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Person to Bunny, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 02:01, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't delete sourced material, and replace it with unsourced material, as you did at Person to Bunny. If Person to Bunny was indeed cancelled, please provide some evidence (a reference to a book, magazine, etc.). Thanks. Trivialist (talk) 02:15, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And don't delete sourced information and replace it with your other information that isn't actually from said source. Trivialist (talk) 02:20, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Person to Bunny shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
(And, yes, I'm aware that I'm part of the edit war, but I can't seem to get your attention otherwise; if you persist, I'll report both of us for 3RR.) Trivialist (talk) 02:53, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Person to Bunny, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 03:26, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Person to Bunny, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 16:49, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 17:05, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Person to Bunny. A m i t 웃 17:11, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:19, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated sock puppetry,

Confirmed via checkuser. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:37, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]