Jump to content

User talk:Tvaerskaegg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your account will be renamed

[edit]

22:50, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

[edit]

11:19, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

August 2017

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Laci Green. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  David Gerard (talk) 19:44, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Tvaerskaegg (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #19116 was submitted on Aug 30, 2017 21:09:52. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 21:09, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Laci Green

[edit]

Go to the talk page before making any more revisions. Further edit warring may result in longer blocks. Zero Serenity (talk - contributions) 22:13, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I added something on the talk-page of Laci Green. Please see if I am missing some rules or guidelines in this matter. Regards,Jeff5102 (talk) 19:47, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Laci Green. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. David Gerard (talk) 22:33, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Dennis Bratland. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Laci Green seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dennis Bratland (talk) 14:51, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Jeff5102 (talk) 14:05, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]