User talk:Tusharmedlife

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, If you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:17, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Tusharmedlife (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

qwwqsd21 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I want to contribute to wikipedia by providing useful article references but not Medlife

Decline reason:

You forgot to tell us what you'll write about instead. You also forgot to convince us you understand why your edits were inappropriate or that you understand WP:COI and WP:PROMO. Yamla (talk) 11:55, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Tusharmedlife (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #25382 was submitted on May 28, 2019 11:35:40. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 11:35, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tusharmedlife (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to be an active contributor here. Would want to request that I will be writing about health topics and will make an effort to make wikipedia better. I also read the articles how to create the new wiki articles that are not there. So, I thought of contributing to wikipedia by writing about Medlife, in a neutral way. If you please check the article, there is no promotion mentioned. And as Medlife is a growing brand with the searches increasing in Google trends, I thought that it will be useful to list Medlife in Wiki. That was the sole idea to help users find about the brand, and no self promotion. Kindly look into this and advise.

Decline reason:

Judging by the discussion below, you are clearly being evasive and dishonest. Please read WP:COI and WP:PAID properly and only come back here when you are prepared to be 100% honest with us. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:49, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Given that you wrote about the company Medlife and you wrote that it was founded by someone called Tushar Kumar, one might look at your username and suspect you have a connection with the company. Do you have any comment on that? And do you have any connection with User:Rahsutpan, whose only edit this year was to move your article from Draft space to article space shortly after you created it? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:54, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have CU blocked User:Rahsutpan based on the CU evidence; it is possible that their account has been compromised by the owner(s) of this account. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:08, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. I am willing to change my username to qwwqsd21 as already mentioned above. Though the username looks similar to the founder's name, but this is not related. Yeah I mailed the user User:Rahsutpan to review the article written and comment if it's good to go. Kindly advise.

You emailed a user who had been inactive for nearly two years - a user who had never been involved in reviewing or patrolling new articles - completely out of the blue, to ask them to review your draft? And they did so, pretty much immediately? And you expect us to believe that you have no external relationship? What, pray tell, prompted you to select that particular user when there are so many other active users involved in those areas? Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:28, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reply. Yeah that right what you mentioned. Yeah I know the user personally. Thats the only reason to ask for the article. And also I wanted to request if you can provide comments for the article as well. As it was not having any promotional material.

You do not need to put every response in a new unblock request, so I have changed them all to ordinary dialogue. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:46, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Please advise, as this will help in shaping up the profile

You will not be shaping up any profile here. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:51, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please advise how to unblock, I have given all details.

No, you clearly have not "given all details". But you are free to make a new unblock request, same format as the previous one, and hope that a more gullible admin comes along and reviews it. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:56, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking

Sorry, you are not permitted to remove declined unblock requests for currently active blocks. Please do not do so again. Thanks. --Yamla (talk) 14:07, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You were warned. You have now lost access to this talk page. This leaves you with WP:UTRS if you wish to appeal your block. --Yamla (talk) 14:19, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]