User talk:Tularehome

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tex Rankin. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Jarkeld (talk) 01:29, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tex Rankin. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! mabdul 00:39, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tex Rankin. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chzz ► 16:17, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tex Rankin concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tex Rankin, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 05:09, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Tex Rankin

Hello Tularehome. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Tex Rankin.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tex Rankin}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:03, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Tex Rankin was accepted

Tex Rankin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 16:08, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Tularehome. You have new messages at John from Idegon's talk page.
Message added 09:56, 14 November 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

John from Idegon (talk) 09:56, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Tulare, California does not have an edit summary. Please begin to use edit summaries. They are helpful to other editors and to page patrollers. Thank you.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 08:22, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Tulare, California, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Regards, James(^talk/_contribs) 23:46, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Charades

Hi Tularehome, I have a bit of an interest in surf groups from California. There's a lot of interesting stuff out there. I see you did some edits on The Charades. Good one and thanks. I stand corrected on a few things too. The discography thanks to you and one or two others looks nearly correct now. Please have a look at my work and if you have any suggestions then please let me know ore edit what you think needs to be. Thanks. Karl Twist (talk) 11:54, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Continued removal of notable person

Can you explain why you keep removing a clearly notable person from the Tulare article. You’ve removed this person multiple times now, as well as other criminals, and have never provided an explanation. At this point I have to say it appears you’re attempting to white wash the list so there is no negative coverage of the city.

So at this point I have to warn you to stop removing notable people that are associated with the city as it is now disruptive editing. So stop removing negative material such as this person seemingly because they are a murderer and may portray the city in a bad light.

Additionally it’s very clear you have a conflict of interest regarding this topic, you’ve mentioned it in talk pages but you are not abiding by our COI policies by openly declaring it. I must ask you to abide by these policies when it comes to editing the Tulare article. Canterbury Tail talk 01:31, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am unsure as how to use this, so if you read this User talk: Canterbury Tail, please let me know and I will respond further. You say that it's very clear that I have a conflict of interest because I've mentioned it before in talk pages. I honestly have no clue as to where you got the wrong assumption. I have not posted anything regarding that topic in talk pages before, because I am not that familiar with talk pages. Furthermore, I am from Tulare, CA myself. May I ask if you are as well? If you are not, may I ask why you are so insistent on trying to promote a town which you are not associated with? I would be more than willing to talk with you on the phone and work with you, but with all due respect, you have been pushy with your comments and opinions. If you would like to talk things out like rational adults, please let me know and I'd be more than happy too. Thank you very much for your time and your long efforts with Wikipedia editing. User talk: Tularehome

So there are two things here.

1) is that you keep on removing someone who is quite clearly referenced as being a person from Tulare. My only assumption on the reason behind that is that since this person is a murderer it paints the city in a negative light. If this is the reasoning, you cannot remove content just because you don't like it, there needs to be a good reason, and a notable person who is referenced as being from Tulare would need a really good reason to remove. If this is not the reason you are removing it then can I ask why you are continually removing Albert Greenwood Brown from the list of notable people of Tulare.

2) as for the conflict of interest, yes you're from Tulare, but you're also the curator of the Tulare Historical Museum, which could be construed as giving you a slight (incredibly slight, be aware I don't think in general this is an issue) conflict of interest when it comes to presenting the city in a good light.

The COI isn't really a big deal here, it's a city, people are allowed to edit cities and add details on them that's not an issue. Since you're so connected to the local museum, it could be a bit more of an issue, but I don't really think so as long as you're able to edit the article neutrally. It's the removal of items, in this case a person, that could cast the city in a negative light that is the problem. You have deleted the mention of this person twice now (I'm assuming the unlogged in IP addresses from Tulare who have also remove it are not you), and not once have you provided any reason as to why you are deleting his entry. Is he from Tulare? Yes. Is he notable? Yes. (Notability guidelines here are governed by WP:CITSTRUCT that say if a person has a Wikipedia article they are notable and can be included.) (Note: under this guideline Richard Torrez should be removed from the article, but since he represented your country in the Olympics he is automatically notable, and even more so for winning the medal, he should have an article created at some point if anyone is interested in doing so.)

No I am not from Tulare. I've never been there. I edited the page as I came across it and it had a few problems so I set about fixing them. Mostly with the addition of non-notable people, and the lack of some notable people. Canterbury Tail talk 01:04, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Canterbury Tail Thank you for the response. I will not go back and forth with you in this on-line setting. If you provide me your phone number, I would be more than happy to actually discuss things with you "in person" over the phone. Or if you do not want to list your number, if you provide me with an email address, we can communicate that way. Thank you Tularehome

Unfortunately all discussions should take place here on Wikipedia, this is what the various talk pages are for. Canterbury Tail talk 19:58, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]