User talk:TuckerAnders

Welcome!

Hi TuckerAnders! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Neutrality^talk 03:22, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Important message

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Neutrality^talk 03:22, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Content not supported by source

Please don't introduce content not directly supported by a source. Neutrality^talk 03:53, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Notice of Fringe Theories Noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Scott Jensen (Minnesota politician). Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:26, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Question

Do you have some affiliation with Scott Jensen (Minnesota politician), his campaign, or the Minnesota Republican organization? I ask in relation to Wikipedia's policy on conflicts of interest. Neutrality^talk 15:55, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi. The answer to the question is no. I do not have an affiliation to any group. Thank you. TuckerAnders (talk) 16:01, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Re this edit: look, if you have a specific source that denies that he moved to the right post-2021, then let me know what this is. But it seems like all the sources that look at Jensen's career post-2021 in any detail are pretty unequivocal that he moved to the right. That has delighted some and dismayed others, for sure, but that's all beside the point: This is really clear in the sources, and it's baffling to me why your edits have tried to water that down. Neutrality^talk 03:25, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Not trying to water anything down. The source made 4 days ago by PBS News uses similar verbiage and wording to what I am using. Only using what is in the sources for my edits. That is more than reasonable and it is a very very reliable source. It must be said, though, that defining the movement of positions is subjective. But, I do not dispute the facts presented. I am just trying to add on with equally good sources. Thank you TuckerAnders (talk) 03:32, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Give the specific time stamp from the PBS tape that you claim supports that. It's an interview and it doesn't undercut the Star Tribune in any case. Neutrality^talk 03:40, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Disruptive editing

Again, you need to stop reverting to re-insert challenged edits. Your edits have certainly not achieved consensus (and your claims to the contrary are simply false). The onus on you is to establish consensus for your changes, particularly for a lead section.

You don't get to strong-arm in your preferred version.

You're also not going to abuse Wikipedia by watering down sources and changing "COVID-19 vaccine misinformation" to "COVID-19 vaccine skepticism."

Just stop the disruption. Neutrality^talk 02:45, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Block for violating three revert rule

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Malinaccier (talk) 18:19, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  EvergreenFir (talk) 03:26, 29 May 2022 (UTC)