User talk:Tstorm123

Evaluating Articles and Sources

All the information in the article remained focused on the science behind the storm. It didn't go into impacts from the storm, as that wouldn't qualify as meteorological history.
I didn't see any sort of claims with any bias.
This article lacks viewpoints; it is simply a meteorological history.
Every link appears to work. The ones that I checked are reports from the NHS and NOAA, and other weather service stations across the united states. Citations are provided after sentences and paragraphs.
In the talk page, most of the issues were to do with technical things. For instance, 15 mph was equated to 15 km/hr. Another had to do with the number of deaths being correlated with correlated with it being a maximum strength storm.
It is part of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones, could not find an official rating.
Unlike our class, the article doesn't get into heavy dynamical details such as omega and potential vorticity.

Everything in this article is related to the topic of hurricane wind warnings. There were no claims or bias. In fact, it presented a warning from the NWS in Portland.
There was only one listed source from the NWS. The second half of the text didnt have a source. However, it was purely factual, as it talked about the use of flags.
There are no discussions on the talk page, but it belongs to several WikiProjects including Severe Weather.
This article discusses how wind advisories are given and the qualification for them. Our class focuses more on the dynamics behind the wind.