User talk:Truecamus1225
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Truecamus1225, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Adam and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 23:49, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Article critique
[edit]Psycholinguistics is an incredibly interesting study and this page has helped me understand and research the topic. The page describes what Psycholinguistics is and the origins with non-bias references and sources that only lead the reader to more information and ideas this page describes. I have read it and enjoyed reading this back each time, thank you all for your research and time to make this page for the world. The page describes the methods and the origins of Psycholinguistics and what it has become in the field of study and psychology. The topics of language acquisition, language comprehension and language production I feel may be overrepresented on this page for Psycholinguistics. Maybe there should be more sections about the neurobiological factors and psychological factors of psycholinguistics on the page. The neurobiological factors may be under represented on this page. I say that for two reasons. 1) it is in the definition of psycholinguistics and it may be helpful to add more sections about these factors 2) there is a slight over representation of the origin and philosophy of language it lead me away from the topic somewhat. With growing technology the topic of neuroimaging is massive in the literature and research that I think there could be updated sources for this page as well. There are not many recent (past 5 years) sources for this page and it could use updated references that either show the progress of Psycholinguistics or how ideas have changed or evolved. Maybe there could be more sections on neuroimaging and current ideas and facts that support a neutral and professional description of psycholinguistics. Most of the references, all relevant and supportive to the page and contain no bias, are from 25 years ago. Thank you all for your hard work and opportunity to contribute to the page!
Truecamus1225 (talk) 02:45, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Group Page =
[edit]Check out the page I created for your group here: User:Truecamus1225/space
yEvb0 (talk) 02:19, 1 June 2016 (UTC) I do not see a link to the group here Truecamus1225 (talk) 21:38, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi everyone!
The Tutunjian article contains a lot of research and combines the psychological aspect - Dr. Bradley said to add more from the article I can add a section with key words from this article if everyone thinks that is a good step! Truecamus1225 (talk) 23:20, 22 June 2016 (UTC) Truecamus1225 (talk) 22:06, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Some baklava for you!
[edit]
|
this is garbage jim is retated I don't have kids in the basment (talk) 19:30, 17 February 2021 (UTC) |