User talk:Truconservative

Welcome

Hello, Truconservative! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Off2riorob (talk) 19:57, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Diannaa ^(Talk) 19:58, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Truconservative. Just a note to let you know that the material was removed because such large chunks of content dropped in unchanged from outside sources is a violation of copyright law. I did not assess the material for inclusion under other criteria. I suggest you discuss the matter on the talk page and determine what to include in the article and how to word it. Thanks. --Diannaa ^(Talk) 20:04, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Morgan Philpot. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diannaa ^(Talk) 20:01, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Utah HB 116

A tag has been placed on Utah HB 116, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bailo26 (talk) 20:22, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Carl Wimmer with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Bailo26 (talk) 20:34, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

For edit warring on Carl Wimmer. Please take the time to read the copyright and biographies of living persons concerns. — Scientizzle 21:03, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

— Scientizzle 21:03, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Truconservative (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm making valid changes to a page and we have a group of users attacking valid content and trying to harass me so the changes won't stay up long. They are removing cited content that can be found doing a simple search engine request.

Decline reason:

You were warned to stop edit warring; you continued to edit war; you were blocked for edit warring. The concerns mentioned below by the blocking admin are also relevant. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 22:05, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please note the concerns listed at Talk:Carl Wimmer. You're unlikely to be unblocked without demonstrating that you both understand and are willing to abide by policies regarding copyright violations and biographies of living persons. — Scientizzle 21:11, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One account only please

User:Wimmerleaks editing on the last two dates you edited is too much of a coincidence for me. (both of you - today and prior to that both accounts last edited on March 20) Please stick to a single account and have a read of WP:SOCKPUPPET and/or WP:MEATPUPPET - Off2riorob (talk) 23:55, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Your recent editing history at Carl Wimmer shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. freshacconci talktalk 03:51, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]