User talk:Trololol123456789

Speedy deletion nomination of Andrew Blank

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Andrew Blank, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dennis Brown (talk) 20:04, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Andrew blank

A tag has been placed on Andrew blank, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Luke (Talk) 20:16, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to the page Andrew Blank appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Dennis Brown (talk) 20:18, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Andrew blank. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Dennis Brown (talk) 20:18, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Andrew blank

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Andrew blank, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. dalahäst ^(talk) 20:31, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Andrew blank

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Andrew blank, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dennis Brown (talk) 20:31, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Andrew blank‎, you may be blocked from editing. Dennis Brown (talk) 20:33, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Andrew blank

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Andrew blank, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dennis Brown (talk) 20:41, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Andrew Blank, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dennis Brown (talk) 20:42, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A quick note

Please realize that if you trololol here, the powers that be will be firin' their laz0rz at you, blocking you from editing. dalahäst ^(talk) 20:44, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Andrew blank, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dennis Brown (talk) 20:45, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:52, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Trololol123456789 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that my actions involving creating new pages with false information and removing maintenance templates were inappropriate. Many people strive to make Wikipedia the amazing resource it is, and I am terribly sorry that I disrupted these efforts. I would like to contribute to Wikipedia in a positive manner to make up for my inappropriate actions. I ask for forgiveness by requesting to be unblocked. Trololol123456789 (talk)

Decline reason:

Given that your only contributions before being blocked was to repeatedly recreate a hoax article, ignoring all the above warnings in the process, I really doubt that you're here to write serious encyclopedia articles. Nick-D (talk) 10:22, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.