Jump to content

User talk:Tripsonroad

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 2017

[edit]

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:11, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tripsonroad (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

we will follow wiki guideliness in editing hereafter .

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:51, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thanks for your explanation Dlohcierekim

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tripsonroad (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I understand the reason for my block and I will not repeat these kind of promotional edits or any contents related to organisation. I never use wiki for promoting business activities. my page is intend to provide only information about various places Tripsonroad (talk) 19:58, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have not requested a new username, so please (as I asked you below) follow the instructions in the block message for doing that. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:01, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Tripsonroad (talk) 19:58, 22 November 2017 (UTC))tripsonroad[reply]

Firstly, declined unblock requests need to be retained while you are blocked, as admins reviewing subsequent requests need to be able to see them and understand what has already been said - I have reinstated your declined unblock request now. Secondly, you will need to re-read the block message which you also removed and follow the instructions for requesting a new username - I have reinstated that for you too, so you can follow it. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks zebedee.. What's my current position ? It's unblocked? Tripsonroad (talk) 21:54, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, you are still blocked, for the reason I gave when I just declined your unblock request above, and you will remain blocked until you make a satisfactory unblock request which is accepted by an administrator. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:01, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Tripsonroad (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

I understand the reason for my block and I will not repeat these kind of promotional edits or any contents related to organisation. I never use wiki for promoting business activities. my page is intend to provide only information about various places.

Decline reason:

The username still is not appropriate. You have to choose a username that will meet our rules on names. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:46, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Tripsonroad (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

Based on the name guidelines i changed this new username

Decline reason:

As you were blocked for making promotional edits, your claim that you did not make promotional edits tells me you do not understand the reason for the block. You will not be unblocked until:

If you have no interest in editing Wikipedia beyond writing about your organisation, then you will not be unblocked. If this is the case, I recommend you consider alternative outlets.

-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:38, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]