User talk:Triping

Images used for decoration

The license terms for fair-use don't justify more than one image to be used for identification. See WP:FUC. Please stop adding these images back to the articles as they are a copyright violation. Also don't remove the fair-use disputed tags unless you explicitly address the issues raised. --NrDg 18:47, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. sorry, but stop the vandalism please!! Triping 18:51, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Vandalism" charges

You really need to stop referring to edits you disagree with as "vandalism". I don't see any reason to believe that the edits going on the Ashely Tisdale articles are anything but a good faith effort to remove trivia and bloat.
Kww (talk) 18:10, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Ashley Tisdale discography. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Continueing to do this will result to a block. Thank you. IntoCreativeJan 15:50, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Ashley Tisdale discography.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. And please stop doing the same vandalism acts to Ashley Tisdale singles, the references provided do not mention the song or are fake since they are from blogs anf forums. Stop reverting my cleanup edits for the last time. Looks like Dienaked/Fotesh is back. IntoCreativeJan (talk) 19:57, June 24 2008 (UTC)

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Thanks for your edit to Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Your edits were reverted because there is really no need to add additional celebrity names, even though they may have been treated there because this article is not about the celebrities. Rather, it is about the medical center. Please see the talk page for further information. Thanks again.

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 18:23, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Untouched (song), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Lillygirl (talk) 02:48, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do not edit war

It's been discussed a number of times. Other editors disagree with those changes, and checking them shows them to be full of false information and incorrect citations. If you want to make changes, please discuss them one at a time and get acceptance for them.
Kww (talk) 23:30, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop putting that enormous change into the Ashley Tisdale Discography article. Your changes have been taken out over, and over, and over, because they aren't good changes, aren't well sourced, and not particularly suitable for a discography article. If you think the changes are necessary, discuss them one at a time on the talk page, and gain consensus. Don't just edit war them in.
Kww (talk) 17:23, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I noticed on the Ashley Tisdale page that tihs edit of yours reverted a number of intermediate changes, including this which then had to be partially redone later. This sort of blind reversion disrupts other editors. Please avoid this in the future. Gimmetrow 13:45, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What is it going to take to get you to stop this?
Kww (talk) 16:57, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

YOU CAN STOP ERASING IMPORTANT INFORMATION, IF YOU DO NOT LIKE ASHLEY YOU DO NOT CHECK HER ARTICLES, YOU CHANGE ALL THE POSITIONS OF THE SONGS AND LEAVE THEM BADLY. Triping (talk) 13:41, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't care about Tisdale at all ... she's just on my vandalism watchlist. You keep making a massive addition of poorly sourced material, and refuse to discuss it. Please, make a list of what you think is wrong in the article, and discuss it one point at a time on the talk page until you gain a consensus that your version is better. That's how Wikipedia works. Not by forcing massive, unwanted changes in over and over and hoping that other people give up.
Kww (talk) 17:44, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Ashley Tisdale discography. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. - eo (talk) 17:45, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As Kww said above, if you want to make that massive a change, you need to discuss it at the talk page first. —C.Fred (talk) 21:24, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

190.82.196.122

Just letting you know, I am fully aware that those IP addresses are you ... reinstating those edits under the IP will result in both your main account and the IP being blocked.
Kww (talk) 13:39, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IP addresses + July 11 edits

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Ashley Tisdale, you will be blocked from editing. - eo (talk) 18:03, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Block - abuse of IP address editing - Asley Tisdale discography

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 1 week as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. - eo (talk) 11:16, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:KUDAI LDA.jpeg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:KUDAI LDA.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? J Milburn (talk) 14:49, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:KUDAI.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:KUDAI.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruption, block evasion, multiple IP addresses, vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

- eo (talk) 15:21, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:File:KatyPerryCIKissedAGirl.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:File:KatyPerryCIKissedAGirl.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 17:24, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]