User talk:Trillhill

Your changes are in violation of the Wikipedia policies.

I had had clearly posted in the discussion area on November 4th, 2005 that the article must be non-slanderous, non-political, and contain facts (which can be supported).

Your "edits" changed the neutrality of the article and is deemed inappropriate and slanderous towards "non-ISSR" members and only detracts from the purpose of the article - which is the Shiloh Shepherd DOG itself.

Any infomation, spins, etc that you'd like to place on the ISSR, SSDCA etc are welcome to be placed in the ISSR page, not the breed page. The purpose of Wikipedia is not to provide opinion, but information to the users.

This is the second attempt for resolution. First attempt was placed in the discussion section as last edit was "anon". Second attempt is now via direct contact to you. Wikipedia Counter Vandalism Unit has bee alerted and the next step will involve RfC/Mediation/Arbitration.

Continued attempted to place slander in the artile will be addressed with Wikipedia moderators. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shiloh lover (talk • contribs) 13:21, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

The entry on Shiloh Shepherds was originally written by the well respected J. Jeffrey Bragg in the summer of 2003. I have a copy of his original article and have only been trying to restore the article to the original.

The link to the registry comparison page was based on a comparison of the alternative registries to the original Shiloh Shepherd registry and is based on their rules as found on their own web pages.

As for the trademark issue, please refer to the 1996 New Jersey court settlement: http://www.shilohshepherds.com/1996CourtCase.htm in which Tina Barber's common law rights to the name "Shiloh Shepherd" were recognized. Pdf's of the original case are attached to this page.

Shiloh Shepherd Dog

Since I don't recall having seen you post on the Talk page before, I'm going to assume good faith. Any comments on the talk page about other editors will not be tolerated, regardless of whether or not you feel it is a personal attack. Please focus on the articles, not the editors. Thanks and happy editing! .:.Jareth.:. ^babelfish 22:30, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Trillhill, this is your last warning. We do not tolerate personal attacks here. We do not have any interest in this ongoing drama between the registries and have kindly asked many times for all of you to take your issues elsewhere. Furthermore, Tina is, in fact, not blocked - she can rant until hell freezes over, but that won't make it true. Being an administrator myself, I most certainly would not have needed to ask someone else should Tina's actions have warranted a block. Unless you can provide verfiable proof, I suggest you not attempt to defame an uninvolved administrator again. I suggest that you work on that article you're publishing since I'm certain its a much better forum for your concerns than Wikipedia. .:.Jareth.:. ^babelfish 17:55, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I willnot be able to act as an advocate in this matter at this time, but I suggest you post your request here [1] and I am sure someone will respond. Good luck.Gator (talk) 13:32, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Korcha.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Korcha.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 07:16, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Laz.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Laz.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 12:49, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]