User talk:Trikebarns

Welcome!

Hello, Trikebarns, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Darkness Shines (talk) 11:02, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do not input patently false info, concocted by an illegal body, on the lede.

[1] :

The Gujarat High Court on Friday held the constitution of the U. C. Bannerjee Committee by the Railway Ministry to probe the Godhra train carnage illegal and unconstitutional.
It restrained the Centre from tabling the committee report in Parliament or taking any further action on it.

[2] :

the Gujarat High Court on Friday struck down the Centre’s decision to set up the UC Banerjee Committee to probe the Sabarmati Express mishap in 2002. The apex court termed the setting up of the panel as “illegal”.
Justice BH Vaghela gave the order on a petition filed by a survivor of the Godhra carnage, Neelkanth Bhatia, who had challenged the setting up of Banerjee panel when the Nanawati Shah Commission was already probing the matter.

Don't reinstate it. Mr T ^(Talk?) ^{(New thread?)} 12:05, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mrt I am not one to anger quickly I understand your nationalist feelings may have been damaged with recent additions of mine but take note I will not respond so calmly next time to your belligerence good day sir. Trikebarns (talk) 12:17, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Welcome to Wikipedia. Wish you a good editing experience here! Fai zan 12:22, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oi

Nang, bugger off on this one mate. Darkness Shines (talk) 16:57, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But this is a good cause I was motivated by your honest intentions maybe your not that much of a pillock Trikebarns (talk) 17:47, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (talk) 18:03, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say I am not a sock that is all Trikebarns (talk) 18:08, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment above would indicate otherwise mate

Darkness Shines (talk) 18:13, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]