User talk:Trihn Ester

July 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Playroom has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Playroom was changed by Trihn Ester (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.983173 on 2014-07-30T00:38:07+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:38, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Passengerpigeon. An edit that you recently made to Playroom seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Passengerpigeon (talk) 00:40, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Page sandbox is locked so I used Playroom instead.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Playroom with this edit, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ~Frosty (Talk page) 00:44, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I told you the page sandbox is locked!

You must have been trying to edit the article about sandboxes. If you want to make test edits, go to the Wikipedia Sandbox which is not locked. Passengerpigeon (talk) 00:46, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Playroom with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ~Frosty (Talk page) 00:47, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or do things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia, as you did at User talk:Passengerpigeon. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. We're sorry if this message has discouraged you from editing this website, but the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia (please see WP:NOT for further details). Thank you. Passengerpigeon (talk) 01:11, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Trihn Ester (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was new to wikipedia. I was practicing editing wikipedia. A user harassed me like a troll.

Decline reason:

Not really a request to be unblocked, and to address your comment below, if we just unblocked everyone blocked this way who said a mistake had been made, what would be the point of having a sockpuppetry policy? — Daniel Case (talk) 01:45, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Looking at sockpuppet investigation, the picture showed a porch, not a ceiling fan.

(Non-administrator comment) The block that has been placed on your account is a checkuser block, this means that an administrator with the ability to look at your underlying IP has determined you were involved with Sockpuppetry. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 01:23, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

He must have made a mistakeTrihn Ester (talk) 01:24, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Trihn Ester (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am 100% not David Beals. It was a total mistake.

Decline reason:

If we unblocked every sockpuppet account which said, "Look, I'm honestly not a sockpuppet," then we might as well not have a policy on multiple accounts at all. If you're to have any hope of being unblocked, you'll need to explain how it is that you share an IP and more with a blocked user. You'll also need to address the disruptive nature of your edits to date. However, since even a cursory review of your edits shows that you almost certainly are User:David Beals (even this unblock request bears his hallmark), that's unlikley to happen. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:26, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.