User talk:Tricolor
Image:Mark&Tony.JPG listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mark&Tony.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MECU≈talk 00:53, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:The Mr. Men Show Logo.JPG)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:The Mr. Men Show Logo.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:45, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Rugrats director
[edit]Please do not re-add that director to the Rugrats article. He is one of about 30 directors who only directed one episode. Further more, Internet Movie DataBase states that episode as unknown. Thank you TheProf | Talk 22:12, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
"That" director was the SUPERVISING director for the Rugrats when it won its last Emmy. Which is a lot more than I can say for someone who polices web pages and removes accurate statements. Try doing your homework somewhere other than imdb. Or, while your there, check under "that" director's "awards" section.
And leave the "experting" to those who actually know something about the subject.
Keep up the great work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tricolor (talk • contribs) 13th March 2008
- I think you'll find i know alot about the subject AND Wikipedia policy. As for imdb, you were the one who added the link to imdb (through your IP). Thanks and have a nice night! TheProf | Talk 22:32, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- Your latest edit looks a lot better. The thing about putting one director in the main table, is you then have to name all the directors there. Putting it abit further down the article allows the flexibility for only the main directors/crew to be named. Again, have a nice night! TheProf | Talk 22:41, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Your point is well taken Thanks for being a good sport.
Regarding Spiderman credit
[edit]"He was the voice director and a writer for 2007 educational DVD videogame The Amazing Spider-Man Interactive Adventures, along with voicing Kraven's gorilla."
This information was based on your credits on IMDb. Is this particular information incorrect? -- Zanimum (talk) 14:42, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if I'm doing this correctly...but, yes, the gorilla credit is correct...ridiculous but correct. I've played thousands of characters over the years but that's the one I get credited for. Sigh.
- Also, just noticing Image:Mark with Emmy.PNG. I've filled in some of the information, but I was wondering if you knew roughly when you took this photo? It would be nice to have the date on the image description page, because ultimately our end goal is to have the information compiled on the site around and worked upon, in some format, "forever". -- Zanimum (talk) 15:02, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- The date should've been May 16th 2003, I believe.
- Apologies...I was confusing that picture with the one taken at the Emmy Awards show. The photo in question was taken in November of 2006.
- So you've actually done other voices? Would you consider doing an interview about your career in general with Wikinews, Wikipedia's sister project? That way, you could talk about any past, present, or planned projects; all of that information could be included in Wikipedia, referencing Wikinews as the source. It's probably the best way of filling in the blanks, to help create a more accurate and balanced biography, than what can be done with the limited "sourceable" information currently available. -- Zanimum (talk) 19:23, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Absolutely. Let me know when and where. You can contact me via mark.risley@renegadeanimation.com
File:Sean Pendergrass.JPG listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sean Pendergrass.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:55, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
The article Brent Pendergrass has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. PamD 22:27, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi PamD, hopefully I'm responding in the correct format. Apologies, it's been awhile since I've contributed. Regardless, I've added two references to the Brent Pendergrass page and removed the {{prod blp}} tag. Thank you, Tricolor.
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Tricolor. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Brent Pendergrass for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brent Pendergrass is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brent Pendergrass until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:30, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
File:SPendergrass.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SPendergrass.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:31, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
File:Seanp.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Seanp.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:31, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Tricolor. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Mark with Emmy.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Brent Pendergrass for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brent Pendergrass (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.