User talk:Trevorhaag

March 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Pat Benatar has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Pat Benatar was changed by Trevorhaag (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.917181 on 2014-03-21T21:34:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:34, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Pat Benatar. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 21:46, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Promises in the Dark

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Promises in the Dark requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:15, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Promises in the Dark.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Promises in the Dark.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:27, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of best-selling music artists in the United States

Thank you for your contribution to this list, but unfortunately it doesn't conform with the list's source. While your edits may reflect more up-to-date figures, as the article says, "This is the list of the top 100 best-selling music artists in the United States only...based on certifications of albums by the RIAA." Figures in the article must conform to that source ([1]).

If you want to discuss this or the list, please feel free to leave a note at my talk page or at the article's talk page. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:38, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Pat Benatar and Neil Giraldo on Oprah Winfrey's , "Where Are They Now".jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Pat Benatar and Neil Giraldo on Oprah Winfrey's , "Where Are They Now".jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 09:08, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pat Benatar and Neil Giraldo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pat Benatar and Neil Giraldo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 09:08, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Madonna at the grammy awards.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Madonna at the grammy awards.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. January (talk) 18:20, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pat Benatar.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pat Benatar.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:50, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Pat Benatar.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Pat Benatar.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:50, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to MDNA (album). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:38, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:38, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:42, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fire and Ice (Pat Benatar song)

The article Fire and Ice (Pat Benatar song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence to indicate standalone article notability; no references

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — kikichugirl ^speak up! 05:50, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Madonna singles discography, you may be blocked from editing. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 02:38, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Living for Love, you may be blocked from editing. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 05:08, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:05, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Rebel Heart (Madonna album), you may be blocked from editing. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 11:25, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Madonna (entertainer). Mlpearc (open channel) 23:59, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Rebel Heart (Madonna album), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 21:15, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Cheap Thrills (song), you may be blocked from editing. SummerPhD^v2.0 02:56, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rebel Heart sales in US

Trevorhaag, I know you have been trying to update the sales for Rebel Heart in the US from a long time like you did here, but please understand and read the reliable source policy of Wikipedia. We cannot accept any random source, especially the one you added. Its a gross, fan created website for "diva" and "legend" artists. That itself should alert you that the sales information or the content cannot be objective. Please try to use industry sources (like Billboard, Rolling Stone, NME, Official Charts, IFPI etc) and reliable newspapers. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 08:36, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Detour (Cyndi Lauper album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Idolator. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Like a Prayer (album).

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 08:36, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Madonna albums discography. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 09:11, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello Trevorhaag, if you think Ray of Light has sold more than 20 million copies like me please come here https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Ray_of_Light#Revisit:_Ray_of_Light_album_sales_worldwide and say im agree with you navyiconer Ray of Light has sold more than 20 million copies or something like that... have a nice day.... —Navyiconer (talk) 15:11, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of best-selling singles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madonna. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Trevorhaag. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Rebel Heart (Madonna album), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Blatant changing the sales and thinking no one should be noticing, its time to get you blocked from this website indefinitely —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 06:03, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 11:31, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Trevorhaag, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

—IB ^{[ Poke ]} 05:38, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]