User talk:Trevor Brook

Trevor Brook, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Trevor Brook! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Soni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:10, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am not sure where to place what I want to say. So, I start here. One of the sites I have added to is to be taken done. It is the one for Sharon Davson - Australian artist.

I do not know Janine Thompson. However, I have contributed to this article, as have others who have done the ratifying thing at ‘Wiki’ for most of the references. I have a large biography - catalogue – book on Sharon Davson and her art; so have had an interest in her work for some years. I have periodically ‘googled’ her web site, other articles about her including on ‘Wiki’. Over the years, I had played around in ‘sandboxes’, but not logged in until recently when I saw something I knew I could add on Cleo Laine and a couple of other sites, and on Sharon Davson’s.

Hers the most, as I was recently on her website and knew I could add to a statement that had been made by ‘GoneWilde’ which is both on her website and I have the book supporting it. It was also easy to start googling for other references, and I have found many that verify the ‘Wiki’ article. I have also found others regarding many more of her achievements that are not yet written about on ‘Wiki’. I have opened all the ‘Wiki’ references, and can give more than one reference for the missing citation. I am adding one now. Is that appropriate?

The Sharon Davson article is factual, and I have made a made a copy of it as it is a good summery. Do you want me to continue adding when I get the chance or stop? If you take it down, can I put the copy back up as it is an accurate foundation into which I could add more? I wil try to find somewhere else this should be posted, but I think I need help.

SincerelyTrevor Brook (talk) 20:59, 15 February 2015 (UTC)Trevor_BrookTrevor Brook (talk) 20:59, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sharon Davson - Sources

Hi. I just wanted to let you know that we've had a bit of an issue with this article in the past (as you probably have already seen), also including the sources being used. Please take a look at the talkpage and avoid using the sources listed there. Bjelleklang - talk 21:29, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, happy to do that. Trevor Brook (talk) 08:38, 16 February 2015 (UTC)Trevor_BrookTrevor Brook (talk) 08:38, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Janine Thompson (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|I do not know Janine Thompson or the other people mentioned. In reading the 'Guide to Appealing Blocks, it mentions having the ISP address. I do not know how that would be possible. Trevor Brook (talk) 08:43, 16 February 2015 (UTC)Trevor_BrookTrevor Brook (talk) 08:43, 16 February 2015 (UTC)~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:33, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]