User talk:TrevorTaylor
|
File copyright problem with File:TandyTrower-HeadShot-250x360.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:TandyTrower-HeadShot-250x360.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 03:45, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:TrevorTaylor-HeadShot-200x260.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:TrevorTaylor-HeadShot-200x260.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 03:42, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
The article Tandy Trower has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Promotional article, most text added by a series of SPAs. Purpose appears to be to publicise his robotics company. Grandiose claims of biographical notability and extreme detail, but a paucity of independent third-party sources to back them. A WP:BEFORE shows passing coverage of the robotics firm. We don't have the necessary depth of coverage in independent RSes to sustain a BLP here.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 20:11, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
I have known Tandy for 15 years and I helped him create the original page. It is now out of date. Much of the information, though not all, I can attest to personally. He would like to keep the page. Perhaps it is the wrong type of page? TrevorTaylor (talk) 05:13, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Tandy Trower for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tandy Trower until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
David Gerard (talk) 09:01, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Thanks David. I pointed Tandy to the guidelines for BLPs. I understand that it is short on citations and I fixed a couple of links today. TrevorTaylor (talk) 09:54, 3 August 2021 (UTC)