User talk:TrevorGriffiths/Emotional Chaos Theory

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedy deleted as being about a subject that was invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally and for lack of asserted importance, because... 1. I am new to Wikipedia and have posted a question about whether I can prepare this article in my Sandpit and then get it reviewed from there, and not had a reply that I can understand. 2. I have not yet added all the citations and references to the article, because I had thought this is only a draft and not yet published, so to have it removed at this stage is unhelpful, to say the least. 3. By having my draft speedily deleted, are you saying that it had actually been posted in the Wikipedia site for public review? That was not my intention (yet), and a more constructive feedback learning process from Wikipedia would seem more appropriate at this stage. 4. My experience of copy-pasting from my sandpit to the draft article page was that it lost the links. That is what I had been experimenting with. Please inform me how I can continue developing the article with its citations of Emotional Chaos Theory, if I remain the best person to write the article.TrevorGriffiths (talk) 14:19, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@TrevorGriffiths: Your draft version where the citations should be added before bringing it live is User:TrevorGriffiths/sandbox.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:15, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]