User talk:Trevguy

November 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Big 12 Conference, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 19:57, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sugar Bowl. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 06:45, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Troubles editing?

I just reverted another of your edits at Bothell High School; you seem to be adding random, single words to articles. Are you trying to accomplish something but having difficulty? If you're just editing for the fun of it, please don't, but I would be happy to help if you have questions--just leave them here and I should notice. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:34, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at State Farm Lone Star Showdown. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Buffs (talk) 06:42, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have just reverted your latest pointless contribution to Bothell High School & note that you have in the last few days made some dubious contributions elsewhere also. For this reason, I have assumed that you are wilfully disrupting the project. Should you do this once more then I expect that who ever spots it will issue you with a final warning for vandalism, after which you will face the likelihood of being blocked from editing if you repeat the behaviour. - Sitush (talk) 22:18, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2012 TCU Horned Frogs football team

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 2012 TCU Horned Frogs football team requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. →Σ τ c. 05:52, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 1954 Oklahoma Sooners football team, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:55, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your new article Trevor Hadley

What exactly is this article supposed to be? It is a strange amalgam of material copied from other Wikipedia articles about other sportsmen. If this is another piece of vandalism, I will leave it to other editors to enforce a block on you. If on the other hand you wish to start contributing seriously, please contact any one of us. Invertzoo (talk) 12:54, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Trevor Hadley

A tag has been placed on Trevor Hadley, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Something between pure vandalism and nonsense: look at the details, the title, and the references: this is about 3 different people all combined together.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Qwyrxian (talk) 10:51, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for repeatedly adding nonsense to Wikipedia articles; most recently for creating Trevor Hadley, who isn't even mentioned in the article, by cutting and pasting from several other WP articles. If you vandalize Wikipedia again after your block has expired, I will reblock you indefinitely.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Qwyrxian (talk) 10:53, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Trevguy, I got your email, and, unfortunately, I can't stop warning and blocking you if you keep behaving inappropriately. In fact, if, after your block, you repeat the same behavior (make articles on obviously non-notable people, make false articles by combining 3 different WP articles together, etc.), I will block you indefinitely next time. If you need help, I am willing to help you, but I have to prevent you from disrupting the encyclopedia. Qwyrxian (talk) 08:36, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2009 Utah Utes football team, you may be blocked from editing. —Ute in DC (talk) 18:39, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism, after having been warned numerous times. While it is possible that a small percentage of your edits are useful, the overall damage you are doing to Wikipedia outweighs this, and thus you must be blocked to stop wwasting other editors' time.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:21, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I received your email Trevguy. If you wish to request an unblock, please do so here following the instructions in the red box above this. Personally, I don't see any reason for you to be unblocked--multiple times you have deliberately and unambiguously vandalized, despite numerous warnings. I don't see the benefit to the project to unblocking you. However, another admin may feel differently, thus why we usually have someone different review unblock requests. Qwyrxian (talk) 21:25, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I got your last today. I'm not going to respond to you via email, and I'm not going to unblock you myself.You may, however, be able to convince another admin to do that, depending on exactly what you say and what your intentions are; to do so, follow the instructions above. If you keep sending me unblock requests directly, I'll have to remove your ability to use the Wikipedia email servers. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:59, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]