User talk:Trent 900

Welcome!

Hello, Trent 900, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Gendered pronouns

I saw your comment on Ultimatum game, and I thought it best to respond here. I'm glad that you feel the same way I do about the generic he, many people resist this. As a matter of clarification I don't randomly jump back and forth between "him" and "her", whenever I introduce a person which must be referred to with a pronoun I assign that person a sex which is used consistently throughout the article. I switch back and forth between male and female assignments. I don't like the singular they because I think it sounds bad and introduces ambiguity.

With respect to the Ultimatum game article, using "him" and "her" serve a purpose. The proposer is male and responder female, so they can be distinguished without constant reference. Using singular "they" would introduce increased ambiguity.

Anyway, thought I'd let you know my thoughts. Thanks for contributing! --best, kevin [kzollman][talk] 01:47, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I understand your position a bit better now, thanks for responding, I was afraid I'd been a bit a bit too dismissive! I can completely understand that you dislike the singular they from an aesthetic point of view - I find it a little clumsy myself - but it doesn't introduce ambiguity, it merely reflects ambiguity that already exists. You only use singular they when the gender of the subject is undefined - so the ambiguity is already there. And I just find it better to represent the undefined genders rather than giving a false impression that no ambiguity exists by using a gendered pronoun. Not an issue of major importance, however, to each his own. Regards, Trent 900 14:39, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Spray forming.jpg

The file File:Spray forming.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, user-created with no source or reference to verify the information shown

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. matt br 06:43, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]