User talk:Treasures1950

August 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to John Flowers with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ 03:11, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Treasures1950. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ 03:21, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to provide me with those details! Considering the speech was to a parliment and does detail information that is in public interest, will providing the direct link to the speech on the NSW parliament's website stop this from being removed?

In general, external links should only be made to sites that provide expanded encyclopedic detail. Articles on politicians aren't meant to be repositories for their speeches or political platforms and should not link to such activities. As a side note, it is extremely inadvisable for staff members of politicians to edit their Wikipedia articles: there have been negative press repercussions over such activities in the US Congress and UK parliament. Public figures do not get editorial approval or control over their articles, rather the opposite: it is not possible to "lock" their desired content in the article. Please be careful, and we strongly recommend that you avoid editing on this particular subject at all. Please remember that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a free webhost. Acroterion (talk) 03:50, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]