User talk:TrapGod

Orphaned non-free image File:U Know What It Iz - Young Jeezy (2006).ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:U Know What It Iz - Young Jeezy (2006).ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:46, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Trap music

Hi Trap God I saw that reverted the edit in the stylistic origins without justifying of providing please don't make arbitrary editions or you will be reported, thanks.--Realh345 (talk) 15:03, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Trap music

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. EdJohnston (talk) 16:37, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Trap music

To stop the edit war I divided the stylistic origins of trap music in original trap music (first wave) and EDM trap (second wave) and also the references I used aren't false check them please if you are unsure.--Realh345 (talk) 16:55, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Trap music

I understand ORIGINAL TRAP MUSIC origins from southern hip hop, crunk and hardcore hip hop, but TRAP MUSIC nowadays is A FUSION between EDM and ORIGINAL TRAP MUSIC don't you understand? Thats why I divided stylistic origins in a FIRST and a SECOND wave. That is what the sources I provided say --Realh345 (talk) 17:40, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Trap music

Though trap music still is in both forms electronic and hip hop actually the actual wave of trap music has evolved into a electronic dance music genre though also hip hop artists still incorporanting elements of this genre in his music and you are that it generates confusion between electronic and hip hop culture that's why I devides the stylistic origins in both the hip hop and the electronic genre. Please provide your sources.--Realh345 (talk) 19:04, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Trap music

Do you have sources that proof some forms of trap music didn't evolve in a electronic dance music genre? Stop reverting or you will be reported. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Realh345 (talk • contribs) 23:45, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Trap music

Please make useful contributions putting in the talk page your statement also PROVIDING SOURCES THAT SUPPORT THEM because if you only put information only because you think is correct is considered vandalism. Also stop reverting my editions and creating and edit war or you will be reported. --Realh345 (talk) 01:23, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Trap music. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 03:39, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, TrapGod. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Trap music, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:34, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, TrapGod. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, TrapGod. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:U Know What It Iz - Young Jeezy (2006).ogg

The file File:U Know What It Iz - Young Jeezy (2006).ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

More than 30 seconds; fails WP:NFCC#3b. Also sample not sufficiently covered by critical commentary; understanding of genre not affected by deletion of the sample. May also fail WP:NFCC#8.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]