User talk:Transerd

Moving Articles

Please, don't move articles without prior discussion and consensus. Thanks, KœrteFa {ταλκ} 12:52, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I did not move any page Transerd (talk) 12:53, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you did; please don't lie. You've moved quite a few, by the looks of it. – Richard BB 13:02, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Transerd. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. – Richard BB 13:12, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Treaty of Grosswardein shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Make cat 13:13, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

This is your last and only warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Alexf. — MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 13:53, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf^(talk) 13:54, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Transerd for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. — MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 14:09, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]