User talk:Traffic Demon

You shouldn't mess with wikipedia. you will be banned and your IP logged if you do this again.

List of best-selling books

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of best-selling books. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. -- Merope 16:01, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of best-selling books

Please note that you have been reported at WP:AN3 (the Administrator Noticeboard for 3RR violations), for potentially violating the 3-Revert Rule. This report has been handled, but no action has been taken due to the length of time the reported edit war occurred.

However, you are now strongly cautioned against edit warring: if you disagree with an edit another user has made, it is imperative that you discuss that edit with them (at their user talk page, or the article talk page), and if necessary seek dispute resolution. Do not, under any circumstances, revert a legitimate edit: doing so simply disrupts Wikipedia, can provoke the editor into further edits - and, can earn a block.

Please take on board my advice, and strive at all times to follow the 3-Revert Rule. Thank you for reading my comment, and if you any questions don't hesitate to contact me.

Kind regards,
Anthøny 16:24, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated removal of content

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to List of best-selling books, you will be blocked from editing. Brian0324 17:01, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Liberty University

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Liberty University. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. --Brian0324 22:01, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I supported the inclusion of the Radar article as part of social commentary (and not so much as ranking), so even as the argument was clearly not altogether understood, there is the issue of consensus, so I would echo Brian0324's sentiments and ask that we not get into edit-warring over this issue. Until and unless consensus can be obtained to include the reference, it should be left out. Thank you. - Nascentatheist 02:23, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]