User talk:Toutvientapoint

Please respond here on your Talk page

Hello Toutvientapoint. As you can see, a number of people have left warnings for you here, even using the word 'vandalism'. It would be helpful if you would add your own response to some of these comments. You've been reported to three different admins, and I really don't know if there is a problem here. If you would respond, we could form a better opinion of what you are up to. EdJohnston (talk) 22:30, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Simply contradicting what others say, as you did above, is not helpful. If you want to make a controversial change to an important article, like Asia, you should make your case on the article's talk page. EdJohnston (talk) 15:35, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You might, for instance, observe that there are twenty references at Geography of Tibet showing it to be considered by various authorities as part of Southern, East, or Central Asia and that the choice also depends on whether one is discussing the cultural or the geographic features to define the area. LeadSongDog come howl 20:38, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by –MuZemike 01:56, 27 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Proposed deletion of List of Shanghai Metro stations

The article List of Shanghai Metro stations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

merely a copy of a template; no other content

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ironholds (talk) 01:34, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]