User talk:Totocol

AfD nomination of Lin Yu Chun

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Lin Yu Chun. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lin Yu Chun. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Satyananda Saraswati

Hi there. Although I see you requested a third opinion on the above, the next time you find yourself involved in an edit war it would be a good idea to report it at WP:AN3 or WP:ANI. Edit warring is bad for the encyclopedia and wastes everyone's time—the sooner a conflict is resolved the better. Cheers, Philg88 ^♦talk 08:16, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Satyananda Saraswati. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

Read Wikipedia:NOTGOSSIP. We cannot promote random allegations. Bladesmulti (talk) 16:11, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism is any addition, deletion, or change to content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of the encyclopedia. It is inappropriate behavior for an online encyclopedia. According to Wikipedia's policies, you are vandalizing the article of Satyananda Saraswati. Please refrain from adding content which is irrelevant and serves only to promote the smear campaign you are launching on the internet. While other servers may allow you to publish illegal text that has nothing to do with fact, we will protect the wikipedia website from inaccuracies that have a hidden agenda. Enigmafay (talk) 08:40, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. Can you please explain how adding information from the official records of a royal commission on sexual abuse is vandalism? Even the organisation itself is recognising their wrongdoings Totocol (talk) 08:53, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The accusations of vandalism are specious. Where there is no intention to harm the article, there is no vandalism. Totocol appears to have a good-faith belief belief that the material is integral to the article, and that its exclusion is illegitimate. This is a ordinary content dispute, not an attempt to harm the article, and therefore is not vandalism. -- Rrburke (talk) 16:53, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:24, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot Totocol (talk) 23:21, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Satyananda Saraswati

This is your final warning before a block becomes necessary. Your continued disruptive editing on the above article is detrimental to the encyclopedia. To continue editing here you must abide by Wikipedia policies and guidelines. In particular, I would point you to WP:3RR and WP:BLP. Thank you for your attention. Philg88 ^♦talk 09:02, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See ANEW

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Totocol_reported_by_User:Bladesmulti_.28Result:_.29 Bladesmulti (talk) 09:18, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've closed Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Totocol reported by User:Bladesmulti (Result: No action) based on your assurance to User:Philg88 that you wouldn't update the Satyananda Saraswati article again until January 15. Please be aware that allegations which only come from primary sources (like the proceedings of a Royal Commission) may not belong on Wikipedia. You would normally be expected to find secondary sources such as newspapers. Even then, allegations that were never tested in court would need to be handled carefully. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:27, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Totocol. You have new messages at Rrburke's talk page.
Message added 16:47, 22 December 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

-- Rrburke (talk) 16:47, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Straw Poll

Please consider participating in the straw poll at Talk:Satyananda Saraswati#Straw poll on "Controversy" section. -- Rrburke (talk) 16:04, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]