User talk:TopherKRock

Welcome to my talk page!! -TopherKRock (talk) 18:43, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

TopherKRock, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi TopherKRock! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:43, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article, specifically Template:User White Plains, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. See WP:NFCC#9. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:21, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ... discospinster _talk 16:06, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. ... discospinster _talk 16:15, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have revoked your talk page access for inappropriate use, specifically altering others' comments and posts. ... discospinster _talk 16:36, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TopherKRock (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know what I did was wrong. It was stupid. I know what kind of disruption this has to people seeking information on certain topics. To do it with multiple warnings was a dumb and childish thing. I understand that. I promise edits after I'm unbanned will be clean and helpful to the site and the particular thing I'm editing. Therefore I believe this block is no longer necessary. User:TopherKRock (talk) 3:09 pm, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This unblock request is a start, but you have failed to indicate that you understand exactly what you did wrong - if we don't know that you comprehend what the problem is, it's not possible for us to believe your promise that you won't repeat the bahaviour, no matter how sincere you are. In addition, you will need to address the contributions of User:RadishLover and User:Catflap08, since there is reasonably compelling evidence that this account is related to them. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:31, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TopherKRock (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

That was my template that Stefan2 changed. He had no right to change it, as it worked within Wikipedia's guidelines. If you are blocking me, then answer this: Does this page (https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User:Discospinster/Template:Abruzzese) violate the same policy? They are one-and-the-same. TopherKRock (talk) 16:20, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

First of all, you're blocked for edit warring. What you were edit warring about was the use of copyrighted material on user pages (which is where such templates end up being displayed.) Wikipedia rules are quite unambiguous; fair use images may only be used in articles, not on user pages. This was explained to you, and you continued to edit war in spite of that. Hence, the block is appropriate. But, given edits such as this, I've extended the block to indefinite. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 17:01, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Me Please

Other Users???

I am no one, but myself. If I could make a million personalities, then why would I be fighting so hard for this one? I would have gone on incognito as person number two, but that would be dishonest. I am not dishonest. I was upset with Discospinster for blocking me, and lashed out childishly (on my talk page). It was wrong and you can read my contrition below.

Please review this based on the merits of what I have put forth and am willing to do. I have apologized. I am willing to make meaningful contributions. Please consider your review of my request below with an open mind.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TopherKRock (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Listen, I know what I did was wrong. It was stupid, and I shouldn't have done it. I was blocked for edit warring, and I will respect people's opinions even when they conflict with mine. I also, should not have changed Discospinster's logo. Though it wasn't signature forgery, as jpgordon suggested, it was a dumb thing to do. I understand that. I promise edits after I'm unbanned will be clean and helpful to the site and the particular thing I'm editing. Therefore I believe this block is no longer necessary. Furthermore, I am neither user which you mention (Catflap08 or RadishLover) and have no affiliation with them. I will only contribute quality posts to wikipedia. Thank you. User:TopherKRock (talk) 23:45, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I've looked at your edits and you seem to lack maturity. I suggest you come back in one year. John (talk) 00:59, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to jpgordon. Please listen to my appeal if you are here to make changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.21.204.252 (talk) 15:50, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

TopherKRock (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17474 was submitted on Feb 07, 2017 17:05:48. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 17:05, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]