User talk:Topauthors

Welcome!

Hi, Topauthors. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. ^{Babymissfortune} 06:20, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Topauthors. You have new messages at Babymissfortune's talk page.
Message added 07:31, 20 December 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

^{Babymissfortune} 07:31, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Roshan Bhondekar

I have removed from Wikipedia:Requested articles/Biography/By profession a long but unpersuasive proposal for an article on Roshan Bhondekar. After a promotional article on this person was created and deleted three times, Bishonen prevented its re-creation, and in my opinion rightly so. If you really believe that Bhondekar meets Wikipedia's criteria for notability, please go ahead and create a draft for a non-promotional article, based on reliable sources, in User:Topauthors/Draft, and invite Bishonen to look at it. If Bishonen agrees that it's worthwhile, it can be turned into an article. (@Babymissfortune:, @Anachronist:) -- Hoary (talk) 08:10, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting you to re-create authentic wiki page of 'Roshan Bhondekar' @Bishonen: - Inviting you to look at it. Kindly help on this to turned this below contents into an article (@Babymissfortune:, @Anachronist:) -- @Hoary:

Topauthors (talk) 11:18, 20 December 2016 (UTC) Topauthors (talk) 11:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roshan Bhondekar (December 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This reads like a promotional piece for his motivational speaking. Please do not insert comments to administrators and reviewers at the tops of drafts. If you need help, ask for help at the Teahouse instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roshan Bhondekar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:35, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Topauthors, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:35, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Roshan Bhondekar

Draft:Roshan Bhondekar, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Roshan Bhondekar and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Roshan Bhondekar during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:54, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't try to put an article about yourself on Wikipedia

Hi, Topauthor. I will not be accepting your article draft, sorry. For an author to have an article on Wikipedia, reliable sources which are independent of the subject must have paid significant attention to that author. Please see WP:AUTHOR. The previously deleted versions of your article have no such sources, and the draft doesn't either; it's all blogs and promotional interviews and press releases. Also, writing about oneself on Wikipedia is strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at Wikipedia is not about YOU and Wikipedia:Autobiography. I urge you to click on the links in this message and take to heart the information they contain, especially WP:AUTHOR. Thank you. Bishonen | talk 10:19, 21 December 2016 (UTC).[reply]

December 2016

Hello, I'm EricEnfermero. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. EricEnfermero (Talk) 17:40, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(@EricEnfermero: - It seems by mistake removed unintentionally. Apologize. Thanks for addressing the point. Kindly review and help us to move this draft into article. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Roshan_Bhondekar

Request for attention

@Bishonen: Draft article has been updated & resubmitted, as per the suggestions.Kindly review the provided references which has been published in international media i.e. worldnews.com & american magazine. We have provided the required information for our promising signed author, as we are from technical team for book publication board. We request you to have a review and guide us on to make this draft version into article - https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Roshan_Bhondekar - Topauthors is an account owned by rising publisher in India (Technical Team). flashingbooks is an account owned by executive publication board team for providing legal information about recent news. We have provided references via both accounts.

Blocked

In both this edit and this one, you say that this username is owned not by a person but by a publisher (or a team within the publisher). This is in violation of Wikipedia policy, and I have therefore blocked further edits by this username.

A person using this account may start another account, for use by just this one person. I strongly advise anyone reading this not to start another account with the intention of promoting the significance of Roshan_Bhondekar. -- Hoary (talk) 13:43, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Topauthors/Draft

Hello, Topauthors. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Draft".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Cabayi (talk) 09:53, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]